(actual badges worn by military personel)

Chinese charater for atomic bomb

The Myth of Hiroshima

"All acts of violence leave their imprint in the perpetrator,
the perpetrators ultimately will suffer violence equal
to that they have inflicted." - Charles Eisenstein

Animated Map of the 2,053 Nuclear Explosions Between 1945-1998

An atomic bomb was dropped without warning on the center of the Japanese city of Hiroshima.

One hundred and forty thousand humans were killed, more than 95% of them women and children.

At least half of the victims died of radiation poisoning over the next few months.

Three days after Hiroshima was obliterated, the city of Nagasaki suffered a similar fate.

The magnitude of death was enormous. On August 14, 1945 - five days after the Nagasaki bombing - Radio Tokyo announced that the Japanese emperor had accepted the American terms for surrender.

Americans at the time were told that the atomic bomb had ended the war, even "saving" a million lives that might have been lost if the Americans had been required to invade mainland Japan. This historical myth justified the greatest terroist attack in human history.

This powerful propaganda narrative took root quickly becoming deeply embedded in the American pysche.

On the 50th anniversary of this terrorist attack, this propaganda narrative was reinforced in an exhibit at the Smithsonian Institution on the Enola Gay, the plane that dropped the first atomic bomb. The exhibit presented officially sanctioned historical myth of the atomic bombings, portraying those bombings as a necessary act.

Although patriotically correct for a militarized country, the exhibit and the propaganda narrative on which it was based were historically inaccurate. For one thing, the Smithsonian downplayed the casualties, saying only that the atomic bombs "caused many tens of thousands of deaths" and that Hiroshima was "a definite military target."

Americans were also told that use of the atomic bombs "led to the immediate surrender of Japan and made unnecessary the planned invasion of the Japanese home islands."

The United Soviet Socialist Republic's entry into the Pacific war on August 8, two days after the Hiroshima atomic bombing, caused Japan's capitulation.

The Enola Gay exhibit also repeated such outright lies as the assertion that "special leaflets were dropped on Japanese cities" warning civilians to evacuate. The fact is that atomic bomb warning leaflets were dropped on Japanese cities, but only after Hiroshima and Nagasaki had been destroyed.

The hard truth is that the atomic bombing were unnecessary. A million lives were not saved. McGeorge Bundy, the man who first popularized this figure, later confessed that he had pulled it out of thin air in order to justify the bombings in a 1947 Harper's magazine essay he had ghostwritten for Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson.

The bomb was dropped, as J. Robert Oppenheimer, scientific director of the Manhattan Project, said in November 1945, on "an essentially defeated enemy."

Harry S. Truman used the atomic bombing primarily to prevent the Soviets from sharing in the occupation of Japan. Harry S. Truman used the atomic bomb on August 6. Harry S. Truman returned from the Potsdam Conference on August 3 believing that the Japanese were looking for peace.

Unpleasant historical facts were censored from the 1995 Smithsonian exhibit, an action that should trouble every American.

An officially sanctioned government myth distorts history threating democracy and corrupting the truth of actual reality.

After 911 it became critically important that Americans face the truth about the atomic bombings.

The myths surrounding Hiroshima have made it possible for our defense establishment to argue that atomic bombs are legitimate weapons that belong in America's arsenal.

I am the Reverend Kiyoshi Tanimoto

A graduate of Emory College, Atlanta, Pastor of the Methodist Church of Hiroshima

I was in a western suburb when the bomb struck

Like a sheet of sunlight.

Fearing for my wife and family I ran back into the city

Where I saw hundreds and hundreds fleeing

Every one of them hurt in some way.

The eyebrows of some were burned off

Skin hung from their faces and hands

Some were vomiting as they walked

On some naked bodies the burns had made patterns

Of the shapes of flowers transferred

From their kimonos to human skin.

Almost all had their heads bowed

Looked straight ahead, were silent

And showed no expression whatever.

Under many houses I heard trapped people screaming

Crying for help but there were none to help

And the fire was coming.

I came to a young woman holding her dead baby

Who pleaded with me to find her husband

So he could see the baby one last time.

There was nothing I could do but humor her.

By accident I ran into my own wife

Both she and our child were alive and well.

For days I carried water and food to the wounded and the dying.

I apologized to them: “Forgive me,”

I said, “for not sharing your burden.”

I am the Reverend Kiyoshi Tanimoto Pastor of the Methodist Church of Hiroshima

I was in a western suburb when the bomb struck

Like a sheet of sunlight.

The National Security Strategy of the United States of America 2002 stated "that mass civilian casualties is the specific objective of terrorists."

When I was growing up the thing I was the most afraid of was nuclear war.

My first year in elementray school we had numerous drills. There was two types of drill: in the first one, a fire drill, we filed out of the classroom and stood in lines on the pavement; in the second drill, the nuclear war drill, we were told to crawl undre our desks, kneel, put our face between our thighs, lace our fingers behind our neck and push that face into those thighs. (I am sure this is where they got the idea of kissing your ass goodbye!)

The main objective of terrorists is to terrorize you. The truth is the Soviets did not terrorize me the government officials working for the United States terrorized me!

Living in a Fallout Shelter

Duck and Cover 1951 Civil Defense Film with Bert the Turtle

Ironically Osama bin Laden repeatedly refers to Hiroshima in his rambling speeches. Usamah bin Mohammad bin Laden was trained by Central Intelligence Agency in terrorist tactics to facilitate the withdrawal of Soviet troops from Afghanastan.

Osama bin Laden is an educated man who understands the power of myth in mass media.

"The mass media sector strives to beautify the leaders, to drowse the community by keeping the citizens concerned with minor matters, to stir up their emotions and desires until corruption becomes widespread."- Usamah bin Mohammad bin Laden

By believing it was the atomic bombings that shocked the Japanese imperial government into an early surrender, Usamah bin Mohammad bin Laden has bought into the very propaganda the federal government used to pacify the American citizens!

Hiroshima's myths have gradually given rise to an imperialist American unilateralism born of atomic arrogance.

J. Robert Oppenheimer warned against this "sleazy sense of omnipotence."

"If you approach the problem and say, 'We know what is right and we would like to use the atomic bomb to persuade you to agree with us,' then you are in a very weak position and you will not succeed. . . . You will find yourselves attempting by force of arms to prevent a disaster." - J. Robert Oppenheimer (prescience)

You may get other to 'agree' with you initialy but you have not won their hearts and minds.

J. Robert Oppenheimer also stoked the fear of an atomic suitcase bomb.

"Of course it could be done," J. Robert Oppenheimer told a Senate committee, "and an individual could destroy New York city."

adapted from Kai Bird & Martin J. Sherwin

"The George W. Bush administration has chosen to bang the drums of war by imperiously chastising Iran for its nuclear program, despite the fact that America has set the example of using nuclear weapons as a deterrent or threat by building up the Earth's largest nuclear arsenal. This is not the action of a responsible global citizen" - Marilyn Rich

"We have more nuclear weapons than any other nation. We spent more on nuclear weapons research than any other nation. The George W. Bush administration publicly announces plans to "update" America's nuclear weapons capacity, building as many as 125 more nuclear weapons per year. And we call countries that want to obtain nuclear weapons technology "pariahs" or members of the "axis of evil"? What does that make America?" - Marc Novak

"The George W. Bush administration new plan to rebuild the nuclear weapons stockpile makes no sense. As we tell the rest of the Earth that Iran and North Korea are not allowed to have nuclear weapons, you would think that it would be because we have matured to the point where we realize that nuclear weapons have no place on Earth, that we have recognized that the use of nuclear weapons has never and will never be justified. We tell the rest of the Earth that they can't have weapons of mass destruction because they can't be trusted, but we can. We are the only nation to have ever dropped a nuclear weapon on fellow humans, and the effects were beyond devastating." - Zaid Adhami

"The nuclear weapons rearmament plan shows a lack of vision for a better future. Whom are we deterring and on whom would we drop these nuclear weapons? Not only could our tax money be better spent, but our minds could be put to better use. We could use our minds, hearts and resources creatively to reduce - or better still, to eliminate - nuclear proliferation and to find compassionate solutions to other problems we face. As Gandhi said, the philosophy of an eye for an eye results in a world of the blind." - Carl Swallow

The National Security Strategy of the United States of America 2002 states that "In the 1990s we witnessed the emergence of a small number of rogue states that, while different in important ways, share a number of attributes. These states: are determined to acquire weapons of mass destruction, along with other advanced military technology, to be used as threats or offensively to achieve the aggressive designs of these regimes."

Exactly how is America different than other aggressive regimes that attempt to cause others to conform to their ideology through the use of intimidation and threats?

"For the Little Boy the detonation heights should correspond to a pressure of 5 psi, a height of the Mach-stem of 100 feet and a magnitude of detonation of either 5,000 or 15,000 tons of H.E. equivalent. With present knowledge the fuse setting corresponding to 5,000 tons equivalent would be used but fusing for the other should be available in case more is known at the time of delivery. The height of detonation corresponding to 5,000 and 15,000 tons are 1550 feet and 2400 feet, respectively.

For the Fat Man the detonation heights should correspond to a pressure of 5 psi, a height of the Mach-stem of 100 feet, and a magnitude of explosion of 700, 2,000, or 5,000 tons of H.E. equivalent. With the present information the fuse should be set at 2,000 tons equivalent but fusing for the other values should be available at the time of final delivery. The heights of detonation corresponding to 700, 2,000, and 5,000 tons are 580 feet, 1,000 feet and 1,550 feet, respectively. Trinity data will be used for this gadget.

Hiroshima - This is an important army depot and port of embarkation in the middle of an urban industrial area. It is a good radar target and it is such a size that a large part of the city could be extensively damaged. There are adjacent hills which are likely to produce a focusing effect which would considerably increase the blast damage. Due to rivers it is not a good incendiary target. (Classified as an AA Target)

The feasibility of following the raid by an incendiary mission was discussed. This has the great advantage that the enemies' fire fighting ability will probably be paralyzed by the gadget so that a very serious conflagration should be capable of being started.

It was agreed that psychological factors in the target selection were of great importance. Two aspects of this are (1) obtaining the greatest psychological effect against Japan and (2) making the initial use sufficiently spectacular for the importance of the weapon to be internationally recognized when publicity on it is released." - from the minutes of the second meeting of the Target Committee Los Alamos, May 10-11, 1945

On July 26, Truman and other allied leaders issued the Potsdam Declaration, an ultimatum outlining terms of surrender for Japan.

MEMORANDUM ON THE USE OF S-1 BOMB:

Ever since I have been in touch with this program I have had a feeling that before the bomb is actually used against Japan that Japan should have some preliminary warning for say two or three days in advance of use. The position of the United States as a great humanitarian nation and the fair play attitude of our people generally is responsible in the main for this feeling. During recent weeks I have also had the feeling very definitely that the Japanese government may be searching for some opportunity which they could use as a medium of surrender. Undersecretary of the Navy Ralph A. Bard, June 27, 1945

TO: General Carl Spaatz Commanding General United States Army Strategic Air Forces 1.

The 509 Composite Group, 20th Air Force will deliver its first special bomb as soon as weather will permit visual bombing after about 3 August 1945 on one of the targets: Hiroshima, Kokura, Niigata and Nagasaki. To carry military and civilian scientific personnel from the War Department to observe and record the effects of the explosion of the bomb, additional aircraft will accompany the airplane carrying the bomb. The observing planes will stay several miles distant from the point of impact of the bomb.

Additional bombs will be delivered on the above targets as soon as made ready by the project staff. Further instructions will be issued concerning targets other than those listed above.

Discussion of any and all information concerning the use of the weapon against Japan is reserved to the Secretary of War and the President of the United States. No communiques on the subject or releases of information will be issued by Commanders in the field without specific prior authority. Any news stories will be sent to the War Department for specific clearance.

The foregoing directive is issued to you by direction and with the approval of the Secretary of War and of the Chief of Staff, USA. It is desired that you personally deliver one copy of this directive to General MacArthur and one copy to Admiral Nimitz for their information. THOS. T. HANDY General, G.S.C. Acting Chief of Staff

"The world will note that the first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, a military base. That was because we wished in this first attack to avoid, insofar as possible, the killing of civilians." - Harry Truman (oops! did somebody forgot to tell the president Hiroshima was a city full of women and children?)

how to build a nuclear warhead

(or fun and games with the sword of fire!)

In the late summer/early fall of 2006 a web site known as the Operation Iraqi Freedom Portal, run by neo-cons in the George W. Bush administration, posted documents on how to build a nuclear warhead. The "how to build a nuclear warhead" documents were more detailed than any other information ever available to the public.

Although it is unlikely that these plans would have been fully functional it is quite possible that instead of increasing the time necessary to build a nuclear warhead by misdirection that very misdirection may have reduced the time actually needed to build a nuclear warhead. In any case this is a stupid gamble to take.

It seems a little disingenous for a government that has invaded another country, Iraq, in the quest for the elimination of weapons of mass destruction to post detailed directions on how to build a nuclear warhead. (Rueters, New York Times, Los Angeles Times)

It almost seems as if the neo-cons of the George W. Bush administration want terrorists to build a nuclear warhead. (This may have been done so that mass media can simply explain how terrorists, with box knives, were able to build that nuclear weapon that was just detonated in a city of false prophets.)

"The United States spent over $52 billion on nuclear weapons and related programs in fiscal year 2008, but only 10 percent of that went toward preventing a nuclear attack and slowing the proliferation of nuclear weapons and technology." - Stephen I. Schwartz, Deepti Choubey, Carnegie Endowment Report, January 2009

SEC. 1070. RELIEF OF RICHARD M. BARLOW OF SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO.

(a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:

(1) Richard M. Barlow was a counter-proliferation intelligence officer with expertise in Pakistan nuclear issues.

(2) From 1980-82, Richard M. Barlow served as the action officer for Pakistan proliferation matters at the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency.

(3) In 1985, Richard M. Barlow joined the Central Intelligence Agency, becoming a recognized issue expert on Pakistan's clandestine nuclear purchasing networks and its weapons programs.

(4) After serving as a Special Agent with the Customs Service, Richard M. Barlow then joined the Office of the Secretary of Defense starting in 1989, where he continued to investigate Pakistan's nuclear weapons network headed by A. Q. Khan.

(5) Richard M. Barlow was instrumental in the 1987 arrest and later conviction of 2 agents in Pakistan's nuclear weapons development program headed by A. Q. Khan, for which he received an award for exceptional accomplishment from the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency and numerous commendations from senior State Department and law enforcement officials.

(6) In addition, Richard M. Barlow received a prestigious commendation from the State Department's Legal Advisor for assistance to President Ronald Reagan and Secretary of State George P. Schultz for triggering the Solarz Amendment relating to termination of military and economic aid to Pakistan for exporting nuclear weapons technology.

(7) In a classified hearing following the arrests of the Pakistani agents, Richard M. Barlow, as the Central Intelligence Agency's top expert, testified truthfully to the Subcommittee on Asian Pacific Affairs of the Committee on International Relations of the House of Representatives, then known as the House Foreign Affairs Committee, that the arrested Pakistanis were agents of the Pakistani government, and revealed that Pakistan had continued to regularly violate United States nuclear export laws.

(8) Richard M. Barlow's actions revealed that certain Executive Branch officials had been withholding this information from the Congressional committees.

(9) In 1989, Richard M. Barlow joined the Office of the Secretary of Defense in the Office of Non-proliferation where he continued to investigate Pakistani proliferation networks.

(10) In April 1989, Richard M. Barlow received an outstanding performance review from his Department of Defense supervisors, and in June 1989 he was promoted.

(11) During the spring and early summer of 1989, Richard M. Barlow told his supervisors on a number of occasions that he had serious concerns that Executive Branch officials were concealing intelligence about Pakistan's nuclear program from Congress and were obstructing pending criminal investigations into Pakistan's procurement efforts in order to avoid triggering the Pressler and Solarz Amendments and to obtain approval for a proposed $1,400,000,000 sale of F-16 jets to Pakistan.

(12) On August 2, 1989, Richard M. Barlow raised concerns about false testimony given by senior officials to the Congress on Pakistan's nuclear capabilities to the Subcommittee on Asian Pacific Affairs of the Committee on International Relations of the House.

(13) On August 4, 1989, several weeks after being promoted, Richard M. Barlow was handed a notice of pending termination.

(14) On August 8, 1989, Richard M. Barlow's security clearances were suspended for reasons that were classified and not revealed to him.

(15) On August 26, 1989, Richard M. Barlow, under threat of firing, was offered a series of menial, temporary assignments by Department of Defense personnel and security officials concerned about possible retaliation against him as a Congressional whistleblower by senior officials in the Office of the Secretary of Defense.

(16) Richard M. Barlow then underwent a 9-month long security investigation involving numerous allegations levied against him by his superiors in the Office of Secretary of Defense, all of which were found to be false.

(17) In March of 1990, Richard M. Barlow then had his security clearance restored and remained in a series of temporary assignments until February 1992, when he then resigned under duress.

(18) At the time of his separation from government service, Richard M. Barlow had completed 8 years of government service.

(19) Richard M. Barlow's temporary loss of his security clearance and personnel actions against him damaged his reputation and left him unable to find suitable employment inside the Government.

(20) For the next 15 years, Richard M. Barlow continued to serve his country as a consultant to the intelligence and law enforcement communities working on complex counterintelligence and counter-proliferation operations without the benefits he would have had if he had continued as a Federal employee.

(21) In 1998, the Senate approved a private relief resolution, Senate Resolution 253 (105th Congress) to provide compensation for Richard M. Barlow's losses on ``the nature, extent, and character of the claim for compensation referred to in such bill as a legal or equitable claim against the United States or a gratuity''.

(22) With Senate Resolution 253, the Senate recognized the importance of protecting Federal employees who inform Congress of Executive Branch distortions of the truth and other wrongdoing.

(23) On March 6, 2000, the Government filed a protective order under the state secrets privilege for documents requested under discovery by Richard M. Barlow relating to the Pakistan nuclear program.

(24) The documents denied under the state secrets privilege were documents that Richard M. Barlow had official access to prior to the loss of clearance.

(25) The documents denied under the state secrets privilege were subpoenaed by Richard M. Barlow to substantiate the allegations he originally made regarding his claim of false testimony of Government officials to Congress on the Pakistan nuclear weapons program and the actions taken against him.

(26) The evidence withheld from the Court as a result of the state secrets privilege included significant, sworn statements from a number of senior intelligence, Department of State, and Department of Defense officials corroborating Richard M. Barlow's charges of Executive Branch wrongdoing.

(27) As a result of the use of the state secrets privilege, Richard M. Barlow and the United States Court of Federal Claims did not have access to evidence and information necessary to evaluate the key information relating to the merits of Richard M. Barlow's case and accurately report its findings to the Senate.

(28) Since Richard M. Barlow's separation from government service in 1992, five Senate and five House committees have intervened in support of Richard M. Barlow's case on a bipartisan basis, and investigations by the Central Intelligence Agency, State Department Inspectors General, and the Government Accountability Office have corroborated Mr. Barlow's findings or found that personnel actions were taken against him in reprisal.

(29) Richard M. Barlow is recognized for his patriotism and service to his country.

In 1992, a high-ranking Pakistani official admitted that the country had developed the ability to assemble a nuclear weapon by 1987.

In 1998 India detonated three nuclear weapons so Islamabad detonated five nuclear weapons.

"This was not a failure of intelligence. The intelligence was in the system." - Richard Barlow

In the early days of the Vietnam War, a CIA analyst named Sam Adams discovered that the United States was seriously underestimating the strength of the Vietcong. The agency squelched Sam Adams findings and he left in frustration.

During the Reagan years, Melvin Goodman, then a top Soviet analyst at the agency, reported that the "Evil Empire" was undergoing a severe economic and military decline. Melvin Goodman was pressured to revise his findings as CIA director William Casey wanted to portray a Soviet Union "that was 10 feet tall" in order to justify bigger military budgets.

(Reagan's Secretary of State, George Shultz, put it more delicately in his memoirs: Reports from Casey's CIA, he wrote, were "distorted by strong views about policy.")

An Energy Department analyst named Bryan Siebert was investigating Saddam Hussein's nuclear program. Bryan Siebert's report concluded that "Iraq has a major effort under way to produce nuclear weapons" recommending that the National Security Council look into the matter. The George H. W. Bush administration ignored the report.

"As a matter of sound security policy, unnecessary classification is to be avoided since it imposes financial and operational costs on the government. As a matter of good public policy, unnecessary classification is to be avoided because it impedes oversight and accountability." - Bryan Siebert

Dresden

Operation Thunderclap

Much like Hiroshima Dresden had no military value as a target. For centuries, it had been a center of German cultural heritage - a heritage that had everything to do with positive developments in human civilization, and nothing to do with the Nazi disease that had been imposed on Germany by the Anglo-American financial elite. Dresden was chosen for destruction as an act of TERRORISM, directed, not against the Nazis, per se, but the German people and as a warning to the Soviets.

The firebombing of Dresden, creating a raging inferno of destruction that slaughtered more that 100,000 human beings, was conceived and directed by a group of social psychiatrists at the Strategic Bombing Survey, affiliated with the Special Operations Command of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS). This group was effectively overseen by the head of the British Psychological Warfare Directorate, Brig. Gen. John Rawlings Rees, the director the Tavistock Clinic in London, which, since the 1920s, had served as a center of psychological warfare operations of the British Empire.

The team at the Strategic Bombing Survey, which included a host of U.S.-based Tavistock operatives, such as Kurt Lewin, Rensis Likert, and Margaret Mead, theorized that the terror inflicted on the German population through the "message of Dresden" would break their will to fight, leaving them fearful, frightened, and disorganized. They projected that it would have a lasting effect on Germany, removing that nation from among the great states of Europe, making it a permanently psychologically scarred entity. The German people, they argued, would be made to realize that "all that is German" could be wiped away, all of its culture and history, in an instant, as it were, by powers who would oppose an assertive future Germany.

"One of the main techniques for breaking morale through a `strategy of terror' consists in exactly this tactic--keep the person hazy as to where he stands and what just he may expect. If, in addition, frequent vacillations between severe disciplinary measures and promises of good treatment, together with the spreading of contradictory news, make the cognitive structure of this situation utterly unclear, then the individual may cease to know when a particular plan would lead toward or away from his goal. Under these conditions, even those individuals who have definite goals and are ready to take risks will be paralyzed with severe inner conflicts in regard to what to do." - Kurt Lewin

As the pilots and their crews came to realize what they had done - the creation of a raging inferno, burning civilian targets and civilians - many returned to their bases horrified. The firestorm was visible up to a distance of 300 kilometers.

This demonstration of military potency retained its psychological usefulness even after the end of the Crimean conference. When the Soviets entered Dresden they were able to see firsthand what horrible destruction the Anglo-American air forces were able to cause to a city far removed from their bases in a single night.

"The bombing of Dresden had little or nothing to do with the war against Nazi Germany: it was an American British message for Stalin, a message that cost the lives of tens of thousands of people." - Jacques R. Pauwels

At the instruction of the psyops warriors, the crews had not been fully briefed on the mission. Now, they were greeted by teams of psychologists and others, who would profile their responses to the terror they had unleashed; they were told, as the crews who later dropped, unnecessarily, atomic bombs on two Japanese cities, that it would "shorten the war."

back to stacks contents

This web site is not a commercial web site and is presented for educational purposes only.

This website defines a new religious ideology to which its author adheres. The author feels that the falsification of reality outside personal experience has created a populace unable to discern propaganda from reality and that this has been done purposefully by an international corporate cartel through their agents who wish to foist a corrupt version of reality on the human race. Religious intolerance occurs when any group refuses to tolerate religious practices, religious beliefs or persons due to their religious ideology. This web site marks the founding of the religion aptly named The Truth of the Way of Life - a rational religion based on reason which requires no leap of faith, accepts no tithes, has no supreme leader, no church buildings and in which each and every individual is encouraged to develop a personal relation with God through the pursuit of the knowledge of reality in the hope of curing the spiritual corruption that has enveloped the human spirit. The tenets of The Truth of the Way of Life are spelled out in detail on this web site by the author. Violent acts against individuals due to their religious beliefs in America is considered a “hate crime.”

This web site in no way condones violence. To the contrary the intent here is to reduce the violence that is already occurring due to the international corporate cartels desire to control the human race. The international corporate cartel already controls the world central banking system, mass media worldwide, the industrial military entertainment complex of America and is responsible for the collapse of morals, the elevation of self-centered behavior and the destruction of global ecosystems. Civilization is based on cooperation. Cooperation does not occur at the point of a gun.

American social mores and values have declined precipitously over the last century as the corrupt international cartel has garnered more and more power. This power rests in the ability to deceive the populace in general through mass media by pressing emotional buttons which have been preprogrammed into the population through prior mass media psychological operations. The results have been the destruction of the family and the destruction of social structures that do not adhere to the corrupt international elites vision of a perfect world. Through distraction and coercion the direction of thought of the bulk of the population has been directed toward solutions proposed by the corrupt international elite that further consolidates their power and which further their purposes.

All views and opinions presented on this web site are the views and opinions of individual human men and women that, through their writings, showed the capacity for intelligent, reasonable, rational, insightful and unpopular thought. All factual information presented on this web site is believed to be true and accurate and is presented as originally presented in print media which may or may not have originally presented the facts truthfully. Opinion and thoughts have been adapted, edited, corrected, redacted, combined, added to, re-edited and re-corrected as nearly all opinion and thought has been throughout time but has been done so in the spirit of the original writer with the intent of making his or her thoughts and opinions clearer and relevant to the reader in the present time.

Fair Use Notice This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, human rights, political, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the United States Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information see: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.