|
"With thinking we
may be beside ourselves in a sane
sense. By a conscious effort of the
mind we can stand aloof from actions and
their consequences; and all
things, good and bad, go by us
like a torrent. We are not wholly involved in Nature. I may be either the driftwood in the
stream, or Indra
in the sky looking down on it. I may be affected
by a theatrical exhibition; on
the other hand, I may not be affected by
an actual event which appears to concern me much more. I only
know myself as a
human entity; the scene, so to speak, of
thoughts and affections; and am sensible of a certain
doubleness by which I can stand as remote from myself as from another. However intense my
experience, I am
conscious of the presence and criticism
of a part of me, which, as it were, is not a part of me, but
spectator, sharing no
experience, but taking note of it." -
Henry David Thoreau
"The Talmudist stands forth as both foreign
and contrary to Nature. The
Talmudist moves in the midst of
Nature as a dull and insensible being; he
certainly sees things separately and he passes over the causal
connection of the
natural phenomenon." - F.
Roederich-Stoitheim
There is an ancient wisdom,
sometimes referred to as the hermetic wisdom,
which states the law of correspondence, namely, as above so below, as
within so
without, as in the macrocosm so in
the microcosm. The universe works as a great
oneness in which the whole is
reflected in every part.
The ancient Greeks knew of
this wisdom.
Above the temple of Eleusis
was carved "Man,
know thyself,
and thou shalt know thy
universe".
One hundred and forty years ago,
the federal government of
America was transferring to itself
the
ancestral Indian lands of the Suquamish tribe in the Washington Territory.
The leader of that
tribe, Chief Seattle, said the
following:
"This we
know:
The
Earth does not belong to
man, man belongs to the Earth.
All things are connected like the blood that unites us all.
Humans did not weave the
web of life, humans are merely a strand in it.
Whatever man does to the
web of life, man does to himself."
These remarks mean nothing to a
materialistic
intellect such as that of the
Pharisees.
They do not make
sense to a
materialistic
intellect that is
concerned only with pleasing itself.
The
materialistic
intellect has only reached the point of
experiencing separation, not
unity. Religiously speaking we would
say that the materialistic
intellect, the intellect of the
Pharisees or
Talmudists are
seperated from God, and therefore seperated
from God's creation. When
an individual grows into maturity
they realize that they are dependent on all other
individuals within the social
culture. Civilization is built upon
cooperation not
competition.
Cooperation creates a civilized mindset wereas
competition
creates a law-of-the-jungle survival of the fittest
mindset - the mindset of the Ashkenazi
Talmudists.
People cut of from God,
spiritually corrupt and
immature individuals,
experience themselves as a separate entity among a mass of
'other' separate entities.
Those that
conceptualize themselves as separate feel no
obligation to do right by their fellow man and
fail to
understand that
civilization is built upon
competition given through a free
will and not competition given
begrudgingly at the end of a gun
barrel.
A life of simplicity, of
moderation and peace, of
love for one another, of
respect for all
creation and of
harmony with
nature is the spiritual way
out of the tragedy which
mankind now faces.
Mankind has the intellect to create.
Mankind, as a whole, does not have the
wisdom to use our creations
wisely. Technology is born out of
intelligence. Intelligence
is God's gift to us which we need to use
responsibly. This requires wisdom. Proper
exercise of our responsibilities is the key to
whether inventive genius
produces beneficial results or
creates the havoc on the Earth
that we are now experiencing.
"We live in a
reality of old and new that doesn't
conform to cliches.
The
important idea is that we must
rethink what we mean and
understand by the term 'technology'.
When we
imagine technology we typically focus on
innovation - the new.
We typically think of one-way, progressive
time lines, dates of 'invention' and 'first use'.
Hence if
you go to certain countries in the so-called undeveloped world and ask them if
they have any technology they will
ruefully answer 'no'. By which they mean they haven't
invented anything important lately.
I would maintain that's a very odd definition of
technology because it's neither a
definition that looks at what matters, technologically, nor does it focus on
historically significant
inventions.
In
the 1940s everyone was excited about supersonic flight and atomic
power, and in today's
history books we continue to
think of that era being dominated by those
technologies.
It wasn't.
Those history books are derived
largely from propaganda about
technology.
One might more
correctly think of the 1940s as a
time of tanks, airplanes, cars, coal, wheat and
pig farming.
We inhabit a
reality where what I call 'the
futurism of the
past' falsely
conditions our conception of the
past.
At the
moment our
understanding of
technology is driven by an
obsession with glamorous innovation
which systematically narrows our vision and
obliterates any comprehensive account of technology's
past.
This tendency is exacerbated by
narratives which repeat themselves over time (propaganda), irrespective of what actually
happened in history.
So we have the
steamship, the railway, the airplane, the radio, global
trade, the internet and the "coalition of the willing" all portrayed as
breaking down barriers between nations.
The end result?
We are
blinded by cliches when we turn our
mind to technology.
There is a consensus
in commerce that certain areas of
technology are sexiest and should be concentrated on.
In fact, we
should invent wherever and whenever we can.
We should, for example, apply ourselves to
inventing new modes of public transport, we
should invent new methods of cutting metal,
we should invent new techniques of
extruding plastic.
If we stop thinking
about technology, as we have
conventionally conceived it, and
think instead about 'things', we might better grasp the complexities
involved.
We might even decommission the word 'technology' which has an inbuilt
futurist spin." - David Edgerton, historian of
technology
"The
consumer driven
economy of America is based on a constellation of
concepts about ourselves, God, growth,
wealth, and the world
we live in. These conceptions deny the
relevance of God or spiritual life to
business activities. Nature is primarily to be
used for human benefit, and anything that cannot be counted or measured in
monetary terms has limited or marginal "utility." The Earth is valued for its
resources, which are assumed to be
infinite and inexhaustible. Even if not, we have faith that human ingenuity
will find suitable substitutes for any shortages, and technological "fixes" for
serious degradation of our natural
environment.
The consumer driven economy presumes that nations and
corporations must grow in order to
"progress," and assumes that the "rational
economic person" will strive to amass as much
material wealth and experience as much pleasure as
possible. These false
beliefs encourage overconsumption as a
way of life,
for they posit a world of boundless
freedom without natural limits or
moral restraints on human action.
Electing freedom to disobey
God's limits,
mankind exits the
Garden of Eden and enters a
world where nature is
to be conquered rather than accepted or
embraced.
The roots of our
alienation from nature are deep.
The
illusions created by the
corporate dream merchants have become the
new religion.
In feeding the
dreams and desires of
material salvation here and now,
corporations have deliberately
created "the
consumer," an ideal
marketing target who rejects
tradition, focuses on
immediate gratification, and is
steeped in desire for all things new.
When
environmentalists claim that we
need to reduce consumption,
business and the
consumer both recoil. The
consumer is so
well-conditioned to satisfying needs through
things that any suggestion to cut back is met with "intense
anxiety,
depression,
rage, and even
panic.
The average
American is
exposed to hundreds of advertisements
each day, and the process begins at an early age. Even if the specific
product is not remembered, the overall message is: there is a product to meet
your every need, if only you will buy it.
In our irrational addiction
to more and more, we practice a kind of collective blindness.
While
many of us pay frequent lip-service to the "free market," we do our best to disregard
some of its most fundamental precepts, a disregard that often has serious
environmental
consequences." - Donald O. Mayer
"Many ecopsychologists seem to share a
belief that modern
humans are somehow separated or
disconnected from nature. To most
ecopsychologists, the existence of a
human-nature disconnection in most modern individuals and in modern
culture as a whole may be self-evident: In
industrial social cultures, most people live indoors and most interactions take
place either with other people or with human-made artifacts. Most people spend
more time watching television than being
outdoors. More people go to theme parks than go to national parks. Many
ecopsychologists claim that this physical separation from the
natural world leads to a psychological
disconnection, that the physical separation arises from the psychological
alienation, or both." - John ScullAdvancing
technology has enabled
mankind to analyze nature,
to dissect nature, to control nature and to
conquer nature, but we have
lost the ability to see an
obvious truth:
.
The Earth is entirely
subject to the rule and control of Natural
Law and Natural Law has
absolute
organization. Mankind needs, therefore, to restructure and
overhaul the entire social cultural fabric, for it is, at the
moment, not woven by
reasoned intelligence, spirituality and
harmony, but by base
emotion, greed
and disunity.
Every human of
discernment feels
humility when walking upon the
Earth as he is fully
aware that the
source of his prosperity, his wealth, his advancement and
power is, as ordained by God, the very Earth
which is trodden beneath the feet of all men.
We cannot
segregate the human
heart from the
environment outside
us and say that once one is reformed everything
will be improved.
Man is
organic and is one with the
Earth.
A mans inner
life molds the
environment and is itself deeply
affected by the environment.
The one acts upon the other and
every abiding change in the
life of man is
the result of these mutual reactions.
Mankind has a faculty which
plants and animals do
not have, the power to
discover the
secrets of nature. Men
therefore have the responsibility to use this power only in a positive
way, to ensure that
balance is maintained on the
Earth.
Change is natural and continual in all
life but disruptive and powerful change
caused by human greed and thoughtlessness does not give
nature time to adapt.
This requires a more
spiritual, less
selfish attitude than that which is too often found
today.
We need to preserve the
diversity of life forms not only for their
own sakes, but for ours too.
A
variety of plants are required to maintain a healthy diet, and
for medicinal purposes as well.
Mankind
generally is waking up to what those with insight, the enlightened ones, and those
most directly suffering, have
known for years:
that we are rapidly destroying
our natural
environment.
There are
many causes for this, including lack of unity amongst mankind, lack of a
common
philosophy of life, lack of political maturity, the
existence of poverty and exploitation, the
division of the
Earth into rival nations, ideologies and
religions, an unjust
global economic
system, and many more.
It is
obvious to any concerned
individual that if
we solved the
problems listed above - in
other words
created fairer and more
rational systems of economics (resource distribution),
social administration and
social justice -
the destruction of the
environment could be halted and be
rapidly thrown into reverse.
Abdu'l-Bahá sketches the following
image of the future state of
life on Earth when
he says:
"The Lord of all mankind hath
fashioned this human realm to be a
Garden of Eden, and Earthly paradise. If, as it must, it findeth the
way to
harmony and
peace, to love
and mutual trust, it will become a
true abode of bliss, a place of manifold blessings and
unending delights. Therein shall the
rays of the Sun
of Truth shine forth over the Earth."
In Christian words -
"Thy Kingdom come,
Thy will be done, on Earth, as it is in heaven."
The message of the Georgia Guidestones is eight
languages: English, Spanish, Swahili, Hindi, Hebrew, Arabic, Ancient Chinese,
and Russian. The message of the Georgia Guidestones
reads:
1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with
nature.
2. Guide reproduction wisely - improving fitness and diversity.
3. Unite humanity with a living new language.
4. Rule passion - faith -
tradition - and all things with tempered reason.
5. Protect people and
nations with fair laws and just courts.
6. Let all nations rule internally
resolving external disputes in a world court.
7. Avoid petty laws and
useless officials.
8. Balance personal rights with social duties.
9.
Prize truth - beauty - love - seeking harmony with the infinite.
10. Be not
a cancer on the earth - leave room for nature.
A perpetual balance with
nature sounds good but who decided the human
biomass must equal 500,000,000 people? Who makes the reproductive choices in
this future vision? Why does everyone have to
speak the same language? What will that language be? When they speak of ruling
passion does that mean everyone will have to take Soma like in the book a
Brave New World or take prozium as in the movie Equilbrium? Will
those that feel called by God have their
faith crushed by those that explain such happenings as a chemical imbalance?
What traditions are to be done away with - the family perhaps? ("Pick you sons and your daughters
too, from the bottom of a long black tube" - In the Year 2525) Fair
laws - in whose eyes, the eyes of the traitorous neo-cons that
deceive Americans today? Just courts - that inflict severe punishment for
minor mistakes like American courts today (curse those evil
marijuana users)? Petty
laws - a
communal affair in the vain of the Kahal perhaps? Useless officials - does
this mean eliminate military men and police men or
social workers and disaster responders?
Balance rights with social duties - are these "rights" actually privileges that
come after serving a corporate overlord for forty years - like the so-called
"retirement" and pensions of today? Nothing wrong with number nine - obviously
a far cry from the materialistic world of today. Nothing wrong with number ten
- but does this not mean abandoning the use of fossil fuels and petrochemicals
for sustainable resources unlike the world of
today?
See governance
See Original Sin
See A
False Reality
|
|
back to stacks
contents
 |
This web site is not a commercial web site and
is presented for educational purposes only.
This website defines a new religious
ideology to which its author adheres. The author feels that the falsification
of reality outside personal experience has created a populace unable to discern
propaganda from reality and that this has been done purposefully by an
international corporate cartel through their agents who wish to foist a corrupt
version of reality on the human race. Religious intolerance occurs when any
group refuses to tolerate religious practices, religious beliefs or persons due
to their religious ideology. This web site marks the founding of the religion
aptly named The Truth of the Way of Life - a rational religion based on reason
which requires no leap of faith, accepts no tithes, has no supreme leader, no
church buildings and in which each and every individual is encouraged to
develop a personal relation with God through the pursuit of the knowledge of
reality in the hope of curing the spiritual corruption that has enveloped the
human spirit. The tenets of The Truth of the Way of Life are spelled out in
detail on this web site by the author. Violent acts against individuals due to
their religious beliefs in America is considered a “hate
crime.”
This web site in no way condones violence. To the contrary
the intent here is to reduce the violence that is already occurring due to the
international corporate cartels desire to control the human race. The
international corporate cartel already controls the world central banking
system, mass media worldwide, the industrial military complex of America and is
responsible for the collapse of morals, the elevation of self-centered behavior
and the destruction of global ecosystems. Civilization is based on cooperation.
Cooperation does not occur at the point of a gun.
American social mores
and values have declined precipitously over the last century as the corrupt
international cartel has garnered more and more power. This power rests in the
ability to deceive the populace in general through mass media by pressing
emotional buttons which have been preprogrammed into the population through
prior mass media psychological operations. The results have been the
destruction of the family and the destruction of social structures that do not
adhere to the corrupt international elites vision of a perfect world. Through
distraction and coercion the direction of thought of the bulk of the population
has been directed toward solutions proposed by the corrupt international elite
that further consolidates their power and which further their purposes.
All views and opinions presented on this web site are the views and
opinions of individual human men
and women that, through their writings, showed the capacity for intelligent,
reasonable, rational, insightful and unpopular thought. All factual information
presented on this web site is believed to be true and accurate and is presented
as originally presented in print media which may or may not have originally
presented the facts truthfully. Opinion and thoughts have been adapted, edited,
corrected, redacted, combined, added to, re-edited and re-corrected as nearly
all opinion and thought has been throughout time but has been done so in the
spirit of the original writer with the intent of making his or her thoughts and
opinions clearer and relevant to the reader in the present time.
Fair Use Notice
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has
not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making
such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal
justice, human rights, political, economic, democratic, scientific, and social
justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such
copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the United States
Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on
this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. For more information see:
www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted
material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner. |
 Copyright
© Lawrence Turner
All Rights Reserved
|