
|
"All organisms and microsystems depend on the
health of the ecosystem in which they live, and each ecosystem depends on
other, distant ecosystems. All higher life forms depend on the bacteria which
maintain a life-supporting atmosphere. While life on
earth can sustain the loss of some species, each
species depends on the whole. None can exist in
isolation on a bare and lifeless planet." -
Charles
Eisenstein
Ecology is
defined as:
The relationship between
organisms and their environment. The branch of
sociology that is concerned with studying the
relationships between human groups and their physical and social
environments.
The study of the detrimental
effects of modern civilization on the
environment, with a view toward prevention or
reversal through conservation.
The first
scientific study of ecology was
done by the Greek scholar
Theophrastus in 325 BC.
Theophrastus wrote about the
relationship between organisms and between organisms and their environment.

To
protect from
loss or
harm.
To use carefully or
sparingly, avoiding waste.
To keep in a
safe or sound state; to save; to preserve; to
protect.

The circumstances or conditions that
surround an organism; surroundings.
The
totality of circumstances surrounding an organism or
group of organisms.
The combination of
external physical conditions that affect and
influence the growth,
development, and
survival of an organism.
The
complex of social and cultural
conditions affecting the nature of an
individual or community.
"Man has been endowed with reason, with the power to
create, so that he can add to what he has been given.
But up to now man has not been a
creator, only a destroyer. Forests keep disappearing, rivers dry up,
wild life
becomes extinct, the climate is ruined and the
land grows poorer and uglier every day."-
Anton Pavlovich Chekhov (1860-1904),
Russian
(The
Heritage Foundation
received $40,000 from ExxonMobil in 2007).
No need to fear industry has
solved environmental problems by going green! 
In 1995 the Global Climate
Coalition, financed by large corporations and trade groups representing the
oil, coal and auto industries (lead by William O'Keefe -president of the
American Petroleum Institute), knew that "the scientific basis for the
Greenhouse Effect and the potential impact of human emissions of greenhouse
gases such as CO2 on climate is well established and cannot be denied,"
according to its own experts. Even so for seven years after it was known that
global warming was real the Global Climate Coalition led an aggressive lobbying
and public relations campaign against the idea that emissions of heat-trapping
gases could lead to global warming.
"The Global Climate Coalition had
in their possession scientific information that substantiated our cautious
findings and then chose to suppress that information." - Benjamin D.
Santer
The International Energy Agency (IEA), which "advises most major
governments across the world on energy policy," has systematically
underestimated the potential of renewable energy sources like wind and solar.
Senior staff of the International Energy Agency is drawn from the fossil-fuel
industry.
"The IEA is delaying the change to a renewable world. They
continue touting nuclear and carbon-capture-and-storage,
classical central solutions, instead of a more
neutral approach, which would favor new solutions." - Rudolf Rechsteiner, Swiss
parliamentarian and a member of Energy Watch
When a "think tank" dies
it does so because it has been "found out" - its funders are revealed for the
corporate yes men they are. At that time corporate funding founds many new
"think tanks" to replace the "think tank" revealed. Climate "skeptics"
(skeptics = people paid to distribute corporate sales marketing) create new
"think tanks."
Some of those corporate
funded "think tanks" that push pseudoscience include IceCap.us, Climate Depot,
International Climate Science Coalition, Fred S. Singer's SEPP, Climate Change
Fraud, Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr., Accuweather Global Warming, Tropical
Cyclone - Ryan Maue COAPS, Warwick Hughes, Metsul's Meteorologia, CO2 Science,
Anthony Watts Surface Station, Omniclimate, Greenie Watch, Energy Tribune, AMSU
Global Daily Temps, Science and Public Policy Institute, Powerlineblog, Climate
Debate Daily, Global Warming Science, Gore Lied, Watts Up with That?, Junk
Science, Heliogenic Blog, EcoWorld.com, The Resilient Earth, Australian Climate
Madness, Hall of Record, Global Warming Skeptics, James Spann's Blog, Science
Bits, Climate Realists, Bob Carter's Wesbite, Climate Research News, Climate
Cycle Changes, CO2web, Green Hell Blog, Climate Resistance, The Heartland
Institute, John Coleman's Corner, The Reference Frame - Lubos Motl, I Love My
Carbon Dioxide, Climate Skeptic, Marshall Institute, John Daly, The Inhofe EPW
Press Blog, The Chilling Effect, William M. Briggs, Statistician, Climate
Debate Daily, The Week That Was by Fred Singer, John McLean, Michael Crichton,
Peden's Middlebury Community Network, World Climate Report, The Weather Wiz,
Dr. Roy Spencer, Prometheus, o The New Zealand Climate Science Coalition,
Warmal Globing, Ice Age Now, Climate Audit, Tom Skilling's Blog, Global Warming
Hoax, CFACT, Gary Sharp, Carbon Folly, Planet Gore, American Thinker,
Newsbusters.org, Business & Media Institute, Milo Yiannopoulos, Andrew
Bolt, Christopher Booker, Drudge Report.
After all, those thirty pieces
of silver will be accepted as legal tender at corporate franchises all over the
world. And we must always remember that the only important thing
in the world is money.
In September 2009 the Consumer Energy Alliance
launched an ad campaign supporting tar sands oil. The Alliance is an industry
front group backed by the American Petroleum Institute, BP, ExxonMobil, Shell
Oil and U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
In America what is of concern is not
the ecology of the environment. Things that are dependent upon the environment
such as plants and animals make up such a small part of the Gross National
Product!
"Agriculture, the part of the economy that is sensitive to
climate change, accounts for just three percent of national output. That means
there is no way to get a very large effect on the US economy." - William
Nordhaus
"Even if net output of agriculture fell by 50 percent by the
end of the next century, this is only a 1.5 per cent cut in GNP." - Oxford
economist Wilfred Beckerman
The oil and coal industries spent $427
million in the first six months of 2008 in political contributions, lobbying
expenditures and advertising to oppose climate action. It seems that paying
someone to sabotage NASA's Carbon Orbiting Observatory would cost next to
nothing in comparison. NASA's Carbon Orbiting Observatory would have answered
any remaining questions as to the processes of the continuing buildup of carbon
dioxide in the atmosphere.
FreedomWorks and Americans for
Prosperity are lead partners in a network which includes the Tea Party
Patriots, Grassfire, Conservatives for Patients' Rights,
60. FreedomWorks and Americans for Prosperity are sister
groups split from Citizens for a Sound Economy founded by
David Koch and sponsored, in part, by
ExxonMobil. FreedomWorks receives funding from tobacco
conglomerate Philip Morris and Richard
Scaife. FreedomWorks and Americans for Prosperity work
closely with the American Petroleum Institute.
CO2 Is
Green and Plants Need CO2 is a project by H. Leighton Steward. H.
Leighton Steward is a director at EOG Resources, formerly Enron Oil
and Gas Company, and an honorary director of the American Petroleum
Institute.
"We find it dismaying that the Chamber neglects the
indisputable fact that a decisive majority of experts have said the data on
global warming are compelling and point to a threat that cannot be ignored. In
our opinion, an intellectually honest argument over the best policy response to
the challenges of climate change is one thing; disingenuous attempts to
diminish or distort the reality of these challenges are quite another." - Peter
Darbee Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) CEO in a letter
withdrawing PG&E from the US Chamber of Commerce September 2009
The
Clean and Safe Energy Coalition (CSEC), is a front group for the
Nuclear Energy Institute(NEI). Nuclear Energy Institute showcases
former Greenpeace activist turned corporate public relations consultant Patrick
Moore. NEI was created by the public relations firm Hill & Knowlton.
The World Climate Report blog is produced by New Hope
Environmental Services. Patrick Michaels, a senior fellow with the Cato
Institute founded New Hope Environmental Services. Cato
Institute reports that since April 2006 they have paid $242,900 for the
"environmental policy" services of Michaels' firm. Michaels stated that the
Cato Institute funding "largely supported the extensive background
research for his 2009 book, 'Climate of Extremes.' A Cato Institute
annual report listed its corporate sponsors as including General Motors, Honda,
Mazda, Toyota, Volkswagen and the American Petroleum Institute.
From 2003 to 2008 the number of climate change lobbyists jumped more
than 400 percent, to over 770. The top ten list of climate lobbying firms
includes Ogilvy Government Relations, Patton Boggs, Bracewell & Giuliani,
and Hunton & Williams. Hunton -- the firm behind the Water Policy
Institute -- counts Cleco, FirstEnergy, the Gas Processors Association and
Koch Industries among its climate
lobbying clients.
Crimes Against
Nature (and each and every
human by extrapolation)
"The
George W. Bush
administration is plagued by more than a dysfunctional management style. It has the arrogance
to create a one-party state that elevates
politics over governance. It has fostered a government-hating
radical ideology that has seen people with contempt
for government acting contemptibly in government roles." - Charles Berezin
"The public good
is in nothing more essentially interested, than in
the protection of every
individual's
private
rights." -Sir William
Blackstone
Throughout Western
history the first
acts of
tyrants has been attempts to
control the
commons which include the
air we breath and the
water we drink. Ancient Rome
had the Code of Justinian which guaranteed to all citizens the use of the
public commons which included
air, water, wandering animals, fisheries, wetlands and aquifers.
During the thirteenth century it was a capital offense to
burn
coal in London.
It has never been
legal in any society or culture to pollute or
destroy the common
environment upon which all
humanity depends for sustenance.
When James Watt took over the
Department of the Interior he began selling off America's resources,
public lands,
water and mineral
rights. During a Senate
hearing James Watt, a dominion
theologist', declared that he was giving away America's heritage because I do not
know how many future generations we can count on
before the Lord returns.'
Since the beginning of the
environmental movement
corporate
industrialists have established
'foundations', better known as 'think
tanks', to counter the reach of environmental law.
The list of
industry sponsored
pollution and junk
science promoters, entities described
as "think tanks", include the Heritage Foundation,
John M. Olin Foundation, Sarah Scaife
Foundation, Castle Rock Foundation, Charles G. Koch Charitable
Foundation, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, the American Enterprise
Institute, the Reason Foundation, the Federalist Society, the
Marshall
Institute, the Mercatus Center, Citizens for a Sound economy,
the Environmental Conservation Organization, the Evergreen
Foundation, Citizens for the Sensible Control of
Acid Rain, Mountain States Legal Foundation, the Advancement of Sound
Science Coalition and the Sagebrush
Rebels. (Later reincarnations listed above.)
"American Enterprise
Institute is heavily funded by corporate philanthropy." - Christopher
Levenick, former AEI fellow
Ronald
Reagan claimed to be a Sagebrush Rebel.
The
purpose of
industry sponsored
think tanks is to run interference for
their corporate
industrialist
funders and
act as a counter weight to
public interest groups shining a
light on the
antisocial activity of the
destruction of the commons by
corporate
industrialists.
The
Christian Broadcasting
Network of Pat Robertson
supported Wise Use making
anti-environmentalism one of it's main themes.
Wise Use, basically a front group for the
resource extraction industry, propelled Newt Gingrich to the Speaker's
chair.
Wise Use spun off the Center for the Defense of Free
Enterprise, Defenders of Property
Rights, Public Lands Council, Property and Environment Research Center and National Legal Center for the
Public Interest.
Wise Use help install
George W. Bush and
Dick Cheney in the
White House.
George W. Bush installed Wise Use radical Gail
Norton and Wise Use
leader Thomas
Sansonetti. Other Wise Use followers
took control of every single federal agency that
dealt with the environment.
Existing
environmental
laws were no longer enforced. Waivers and exemptions to
corporatist
polluters and
campaign contributors is the standard.
George W. Bush
marketed Gail Norton
as a lifelong conservationist even though Gail
Norton advocated an end to the enforcement of
environmental
regulations while
working for the Pacific Research
Institute for Public Policy in 1989 (liar!). Gail Norton stated, in regard to the end of the
enforcement of
environmental
regulation, "I view that as something positive."
In a 1996 speech Gail Norton listed federal
incursions into the private domain as atrocities.
These included American with Disabilities Act requirements for
wheelchair ramps, Environmental
Protection Agency requirements to remove asbestos from
schools and the Fair Labor Standards
Act.
Gail Norton has suggested that no
National Park, National Monument or National Forest land should be exempt from
mineral extraction, oil extraction, and
timber extraction. If rare and species are present it is decreed they do not
exist. No
plant or animal = no protection
problems!
"Gail Norton's five-year
tenure as Interior secretary has irreparably damaged our country. Under her
leadership employees in the Bureau of Land
Management and the Forest Service have been demoralized into leaving
their positions - replaced by people who don't mind giving away our public lands to the energy and
timber industries. Our national parks
are in their worst shape ever. When Gail Norton next
visits her cherished Western mountains.
She will find the scenery altered; it now includes drilling rigs, clear-cutting
and new roads churned by off-road vehicles. Gail
Norton's oil and gas friends
will probably take good care of her; they owe her big time." - Crista Worthy
Wise
Use ideologues have tried to
con-vince us that American
government and its laws are illegitimate and that the illegitimacy makes it
permissible for them to violate
laws. Wise Use
ideologues subvert the law, corrupt
American democracy,
distort science and
deceive the very people they have been
appointed to serve - Americans.
"The
Environmental Protection Agency is no
longer a public health agency. With
the George W. Bush administration, whether or not
environmental
laws are enforced depends on who you
know." - former chief
enforcement
officer of the
Environmental Protection Agency Eric
Shaeffer
"The George W.
Bush administration routinely mismanages
scientific
information through distortion and omission
whenever scientific
truth is inconvenient to its
industrial allies. It's hard to decide
what is more demoralizing about the administration's politicization of the
scientific process - its disdain
for professional scientists
working for American government or its willingness to
deceive the American
public." - Roger G. Kennedy, former
director of the National Park
Service.
"The current
George W. Bush administration has taken
intolerance of
science dissent to a new orbit. The
repression against internationally
renowned professionals and experts in their
fields just for exercising the scientific method objectively is
unprecedented." - Tom Devine, a Goldwater
Republican who monitors the
treatment of federal whistleblowers for the nonpartisan
Government Accountability Project.
John
Graham, a Wise Use sycophant, founded
the Harvard Center for Risk Analysis in 1989 and started the
junk-science of
cost-benefit analysis which claims
to be able to compare the monetary cost of the implementation of new
laws against that laws benefit to
the social culture. In John Graham
analysis' if a fish has no
commercial
value and 10 million fish
die because of
toxic
pollution the
economic cost is zero, as they have no
commercial
value.
{"It's easier to kill a
number than an individual, whether we're talking about so many tons of fish,
so many board feet of timber, or so many boxcars of untermenschen."
- Derrick Jensen}
John Graham's
cost-benefit analysis in
conjunction with a corporatist interpretation of Milton Friedman's Chicago
School of Economics ideology is spiritually corrupt because both neglect to
take into account the effects produced on the lives of the citizens of the
civilization they pretend to serve!
In John Graham's cost-benefit analysis it does not
matter if the value of the life that is being analyzed is fish or human.
People are going to die anyhow. Baby boomer retirees have given all they
can give to the economic system and as such in
any cost-benefit analysis it is
economically better for society if these used up hulks just die as they
are no longer producing for the system. (Perhaps if industry developed many
different types of chemicals that ultimately cause
premature death Social Security costs would fall. Oh
wait they already do - in the food -
trans fat, high fructose corn syrup and
chemicals, like the artificial butter
flavoring, diacetyl and melamine - and in the
air, earth and water -
fluoride,
perfluorooctanoic acid,
methyl tert-butyl ether,
bisphenol A,
phthalates,
pyrethroids,
polybrominated diphenyl ethers,
polytetrafluoroethylene,
perchlorate,
mercury,
trichloroethylene,
polychlorinated biphenyls,
lead,
asbestos and
organophosphates.
"At the shallowest level
cost-benefit analysis' is a cheap
deception of the general
public. At its worst this approach
represents a serious erosion in the way a democracy deals with
science. You create high-sounding credentials and talk in tones that
appear scientifically sensible,
while all the time you are just fronting for a political agenda. If you believe in a rational
universe, in enlightenment, in knowledge, and in a search for the
truth the George W. Bush
White House is an
absolute
disaster." -
Princeton University
scientist Michael Oppenheimer
"Environmentalists do not view
economics as the enemy because
cost-benefit analysis is thoroughly
unromantic; economics view the environment as
invisible because their cost-benefit
analysis is fatally flawed. A full cost
accounting of industrial practices reveals how much the natural services of ecosystems threatened or
destroyed by development and industrial
pollution are actually worth in addition to the real value of
natural resources
consumed and wasted. Environmentalists are
simply not in thrall to the church
of neo-liberal economics and the
priests of predatory corporatism, who are spending our principal and deferring
environmental debt like there's no tomorrow."- Andrew
Christie
John Graham was appointed by
George W. Bush to head the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs in 2001.
John Graham's central role is undermining
environmental
protection through research' papers based on
cost-benefit analysis.
John Graham has blocked every rule change that
protects the
environment including two dozen
proposed by the Environmental Protection
Agency. Rules John
Graham has fought to have rescinded include reduced arsenic levels in
drinking water, reduced
pollution from
coal burning plants and regulation of fecal waste from industrial factory farms.
{Cost-benefit analysis =
only 50 humans out of a thousand will die
prematurely from cancer over the
next five years and the cost to save the 200,000
thousand or so people that will die
prematurely would require entire industry upgrades costing 200 billion
dollars or a million per individual saved from premature
death and is therefore not
economically feasible. Since
American aristocracy can and does chose to
live far from
toxic polluters their
chance of dying from
cancer due to
toxins approaches zero. Must be
nice!}
"Factory farmed animals such as
cattle, pigs and
chickens, live in unnatural and cruel conditions,
which do not allow them to live the
way nature
intended. Factory farmers treat them as commodities rather than
living, breathing,
sentient beings that
feel pain and suffer, just as we do. It's
time to make changes, not just because of the harm to our health and
environment but because
having respect for all beings will help
create a more humane world." - Valerie Belt
Wise Use
ideology has engineered the passage of
laws in Missouri and Iowa making it a crime to
photograph industrial factory farm
animals!
{The 2009
swine flu pandemic started at a Smithfield Foods - the world's largest pork
packer and hog producer - massive hog-raising operation in Perote, Mexico, in
the state of Vera Cruz. A Smithfield subsidiary, Granjas Carrol, raises 950,000
hogs per year. Residents of Perote believed the outbreak had been caused by
contamination from pig breeding farms located in the area which polluted the
atmosphere and local water bodies and in turn led to the disease
outbreak.
A municipal health official stated that preliminary
investigations indicated that the disease vector was a type of fly that
reproduces in pig waste and that the outbreak was linked to the industrial pig
farms. According to residents the organic and fecal waste produced by Granjas
Carrol isn't adequately treated. Swarms of flies hovering around waste lagoons
transfer respiratory ailments.
Mexican health agency Instituto Mexicano
del Seguro Social has acknowledged that the original carrier for the flu could
be the "clouds of flies" that multiply in the Smithfield subsidiary's manure
lagoons.
The increased use of antibiotics in animal production has gone
hand-in-hand with the development of factory farms - industrial-style livestock
operations. Thousands of animals are crammed into the unhygienic, crowded
quarters of a typical industrial-style livestock operation, and antibiotics are
dispensed constantly through the animals' feed.
Twenty-five million
pounds of antibiotics are fed to livestock in the United States annually -
eight times more than the amount used as human medicine. Six of the 17 classes
of antibiotics used to promote growth in animals are also used to treat
diseases in humans. A Harvard University study showed that antibiotic-resistant
genes found in bacteria infecting humans were identical to some of the same
bacteria infecting animals.
The Pew Commission on Industrial Farm
Animal Production recommended: "Ban the non-therapeutic use of antimicrobials
in food animal production to reduce the risk of antimicrobial resistance to
medically important antibiotics and other microbials."
In 1998 in the
nation's largest pig farm, a North Carolina factory farm, an aggressive H3N2
virus of a never-before-described triple hybrid of three viruses - a human
virus, a pig virus and a bird virus - was discovered.
"Recently
evolving intensive farming practice of raising pigs and poultry in adjacent
sheds is unsound. Within the swine population, we now have a mammalian-adapted
virus that is extremely promiscuous." - Dr. Robert Webster, world's leading flu
virus evolution expert
"If you wanted to create global pandemics, you'd
build as many of these factory farms as possible. That's why the development of
swine flu isn't a surprise to those in the public health community. In 2003,
the American Public Health Association - the oldest and largest in world -
called for a moratorium of factory farming because they saw something like this
would happen. It may take something as serious as a pandemic to make us realize
the real cost of factory farming." - Dr. Michael Greger
Industrial
farming has also been labeled as CAFOs (Concentrated Animal Feeding
Operations).
"Adrian Gibbs, 75, who collaborated on research that led to
the development of Roche Holding AG's Tamiflu drug, said in an interview that
he intends to publish a report suggesting the new strain may have accidentally
evolved in eggs scientists use to grow viruses and drugmakers use to make
vaccines. Gibbs said he came to his conclusion as part of an effort to trace
the virus's origins by analyzing its genetic blueprint." - Jason Gale and
Simeon Bennett}
Thirteen states have laws making
it illegal to criticize produce!
Strip mining was just the start. In
Appalachia they do not just strip the Earth for
coal seams lying a few feet under the
surface they take the entire tops off
mountains and dump them in streams! A
rule change allowed strip
mining waste to be reclassified as fill'. Between 1992 and 2002, twelve
hundred miles (1200) of stream bed was 'filled'.
"Mountaintop removal
is not only stupid, as the habitat of wildlife is destroyed in the name of
profit and greed, it is immoral and
shortsighted." - Gail Rubio
In 2004 a judge revoked 11 permits issued by
the Army Corps of Engineers under the Nationwide Permit 21 process which
allowed 'streamlined permitting'.
In November 2005 'steamlined
permitting' for mountaintop removal and
streambed filling was reinstated on appeal.
The United States 4th
Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that mountaintop removal and streambed filling
complied with the Clean Water Act.
"I've been regulating mining since
1966 and this is the most lawless administration I have encountered. They have
no regard for protecting miners or the
people in mining communities. They are
without scruples. The
corruption and lawlessness goes all the
way to the top." - Jack Spadaro,
former superintendent of the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (see
canary in a coal mine)
The pillage of Appalachia
by the coal
industry is being made possible by
officials who view
public
service as an
opportunity for wholesale plunder.
In the flurry of rule changes that took place on George W. Bush's exit
many environmental regulations were gutted. A change to the rule on mountaintop
removal and stream filling was changed to circumvent government oversight. The
rule gives coal corporations a legal right to do what, in the past, they could
do only in exceptional circumstances, with special permission from the
government.
"The Environmental
Protection Agency's own scientists have concluded that dumping mining waste
into streams devastates downstream water quality. By signing off on this rule,
the agency has abdicated its responsibility." - Edward C. Hopkins
"This is unmistakably a fire sale of epic size for coal and the entire
fossil fuel industry, with flagrant disregard for human health, the environment
or the rule of law." - Vickie Patton
"With less than two months left in
power the Bush administration is determined to cement its legacy as having the
worst environmental record in history." - Joan M. Mulhern
"Federal law
allows coal mine waste to be placed in streams." - Peter L. Mali, a spokesman
for the Interior Department office that wrote the new regulation (I'll bet that
water sure tastes good!)
"The George W. Bush
administration and the coal
industry have teamed up to wipe
Appalachia off the map. This is Appalachia's last
stand. When the
mountaints go, so goes our
culture and our people, and it will be the
George W. Bush administration that pushes the
stake through our heart." - Judy Bonds
On
Friday the 13th of February 2009 the United States Court of Appeals for the
Fourth Circuit, in Richmond, Va., overturned a 2007 decision that supported
environmentalists' claims that the Army Corps of Engineers had improperly
issued permits for mountaintop coal mining in Appalachia. Now "clean coal"
companies will be able to continue blasting the tops off mountains and dumping
the leftover rock in valleys, burying streams forever. (Arsenic, cadmium and
mercury sure tastes good in water!)
"The scientific evidence of the
severe environmental and human impacts from mountaintop mining is strong and
irrefutable." - Margaret Palmer
1 in 6 American women have
mercury levels in their
blood streams that carry levels
of mercury
enough to cause neurological
damage in their unborn children.
"The science is certain -
levels impact a baby's IQ." -
Dr. David Carpenter of the Institute for Health and the Environment at the
State University of New York at Albany (Of course this is an
excellent way to produce mindless human
robots for the military-industrial-corporate-entertainment
complex!)
Free market
capitalism, which involves
cooperation as opposed to
coercion, is the best
thing that could
happen to the
American
environment, the
American economy
and the American people. True free
market
capitalism, in which businesses pay all
the costs of bringing their products to
market, is the most efficient and
democratic
way of distributing the goods of the
land - and the surest way to
eliminate pollution.
Free markets, when allowed to function
properly value raw materials and encourage producers to eliminate
waste by reducing, reusing, and
recycling.
"In a natural
or unmanipulated or free-market economy, the private participants or actors
make decisions on their own. When there are billions of decisions that have to
be made and re-made continuously, there is really no other possible method that
is efficient and effective at producing greater wealth and welfare except
decentralized decision-making and choice." - Michael S. Rozeff
Corporatism, as it
exists in America
today, is the anti-thesis of free
markets.
"At least four
aspects of current corporatism are not
true to free
market theory and result in various forms of overconsumption.
First, the current system fails to discourage
monopolies and ever-greater
concentrations of capital.
Second, the system will generally reward a business that imposes costs on
others by generating negative
externalities. Third, reliable factual
information is not easily available to consumers. Fourth,
government and business have become
inexorably intertwined, with
massive subsidies tilting
the free market playing field toward some
highly consumptive
economic activities and away from others." -
Donald O. Mayer
"In the two plus centuries it has been practiced,
orthodox classical corporatism has not
brought a growing or even a stable level of prosperity to the peoples who
inhabit the countries in which it has been practiced. Spurts of apparent
prosperity have been continuously destroyed by economic crashes that have over and over again
ruined the lives of millions.
What if its
intent has never been the promotion of the people's prosperity?
What, if any, result has it attained consistently?
Well, it has
consistently protected the wealth of the
privileged; it has preserved the status quo.
The wealthy privileged increase their wealth in
good times and in bad." - John Kozy
In a
truly free
market economy, when you make yourself
wealthy, you enrich your community.
Corporatist
polluters make themselves
wealthy by making everybody else
poor. They raise the standard of
living for themselves by lowering the quality
of life for everyone else.
Corporatist
polluters do that by escaping the
discipline of the free market.
The coal
burning utilities that acidify the
Adirondack Lakes, poison our
waterways with
mercury, provoke 120,000
asthma attacks, and
kill 30,000 of our neighbors every year are imposing
costs on the rest of us that should, in a truly
free market economy, be reflected in the price of the energy
when they bring it to the marketplace.
By avoiding these
costs, the utilities are able to enrich their shareholders and put their more
conscientious and efficient competitors out of business. These
costs do not just disappear. The American people
pay for them downstream - with poisoned fish, sickened
children, a diminished quality of
life and a shortened life span.
Every one of America's federal
environmental
laws is intended to restore true free
market
capitalism so that the price of bringing
a product to
market
reflects the costs that it
imposes on the public.
When
polluters cheat, it distorts the
entire marketplace, and none of us
benefit from free
market efficiencies.
Corporatists do not want
free markets, they want dependable
profits, and their surest route is to
crush the competition by
controlling the State.
The domination of
American State by
large corporations leads to the
elimination of free
markets and, ultimately, to the
loss of democracy.
"The narrative for corporate
America has changed. Government is not seen in opposition to the firm, but as a
partner." - Rakesh Khurana, professor Harvard Business School 03/28/09
Some of the largest federal
subsidies are going to western
resource industries - grazing, lumber, mining, and
agribusiness - that have spawned the
most vocal attacks against federal environmental laws. These industries are run by some of the richest
and most radical people in the country, men like
Richard Mellon Scaife,
Charles Hurwitz
(Headwaters Forest Reserve rapist), Charles Koch and Joseph Coors. (Joseph
Coors founded the Heritage
Foundation.)
"Wise Use
groups and others, out of duplicity or ignorance, posture as defenders of the
free market. But in
fact, they often argue for special
privileges and protections that cost the
environment,
consumers and
taxpayers dearly." - John A. Baden, Ph.D.
and Tim OBrienIntense hatred for State regulation is combined with an intense
reliance on federal subsidies.
Taxpayers gave away at the turn of the
21st century $65 billion every year in subsidies to big
oil and more than $35 billion a year in
subsidies to the radical owners of
western resource
industries many of whom are
destroying America's public lands and
waterways with unsustainable practices.
Conservative Senator John Sununu stated after helping to
defeat Dick
Cheney's Wise Use energy bill, "As
fiscal conservatives we have to stand for some
thing. This bill broke the budget caps for
2004 and busted budget caps over a five-year period. The
tax provisions were outrageous. The
agreement had over $24 billion in tax
breaks. There's just no need to provide special consideration to the
oil, gas,
coal industries or the
nuclear power
industry. These are healthy, robust,
competitive
industries, and they don't need special
treatment or a special tax break from the
federal government."
Subsidies helped create the billionaires who financed the
right-wing revolution on Capitol Hill that put
George W. Bush and
Dick Cheney in the
White House. The
free market has been all but eliminated in
an energy sector dominated by cartels and
monopolies and distorted by
subsidies to the
polluters.
America's once vibrant agricultural
markets are now basically
controlled by multinational
monopolies with no demonstrated
loyalty to America, the American people, the American environment or American law.
In
Spain,
Germany, and
Italy
industrialists and the
aristocracy forged alliances with
right-wing radicals and
charismatic leaders to win elections in
Italy and
Germany by embracing a
fascist ideology - the term fascist was created by Benito Mussolini.
Fascists took over
government ministries running them for
their own profit, pouring
government money into
corporate coffers by awarding
lucrative contracts to prosecute wars and
build infrastructure with little or no State
oversight. (Iraq?)
The ideology of
American corporatism is very similar to
fascism in the following
ways:
"The Fascist
State lays claim to rule in the
economic field." -
Benito Mussolini
In
American corporatism the State licenses
corporations and fulfills
corporate lobbyists "wish lists"by
insuring corporate profits through
State decree,
deregulation, bail
outs, subsidies and tax
relief.
"Anti-individualistic, the Fascist conception of life stresses the
importance of the State and accepts the
individual only in so
far as his interests coincide with those of the State." - Benito Mussolini
In American
corporatism incorporated organizations
are designed as
wealth producing entities and
are not designed to be
socially responsible.
State entities are designed for social
control purposes with the clear
intent of conditioning the behavior of the
social culture to
conform to corporately acceptable norms
of consumption - thus keeping the
industrial machine humming. The
corporate State is concerned with the
individual's welfare
only when the promotion of an
individual's welfare
coincides with needs of the State or the
corporation.
"Fascism is definitely and absolutely
opposed to the doctrines of liberalism, both in the
political and the economic sphere." -
Benito Mussolini
Fascism is opposed to
liberalism because
liberalism emphasizes
individual rights and
equality of opportunity.
Liberalistic ideology includes extensive freedom of thought and
speech with the right to question the decisions of State authority, limitations on the
power of the State
through the granting of basic
human rights, the
rule of law applied equally to all
segments of society, the free exchange of
ideas, concepts and
knowledge which are judged on their merits alone - not on status of the
celebrities which support them, a
true free market
economy - as opposed to a State granted
monopolistic
economy - and a transparent system of government.
In American
corporatism
corporate and
State entities have the right to free speech (for
corporations -
hiring lobbyists, lying in
marketing campaigns and easy access to
mass media; for government - lying to elicit confessions,
covering up wrongdoing and
modifing public opinion)
individual voices are
only heard if they conform to the
mass media propaganda,
freedom of thought is
discouraged (accept corporate and
government propaganda or become a
social outcast),
government power has
increased exponentially while individual rights
guaranteed by the Constitution are trampled, the rule of
law applies only to individuals - who are
punished with incarceration (corporations break the laws and consider fines
a cost of doing business - you can not incarcerate a
corporation!),
ideas are no longer freely exchanged (but you can buy
unimportant ideas from the
publisher) and
Dick Cheney never wrote e-mails, memos or
directives so no one will ever know why the
George W. Bush administration took the actions it
did.
The elected fascist
governments of
Spain,
Germany, and
Italy used the provocation
of terrorist attacks, continual
wars, and invocations of
patriotism and homeland
security to
privatize the commons, tame the
press, muzzle criticism by opponents, and
turn government over to
corporate control. The easiest
thing for a political leaders to do is
appeal to our fear, our
hatred, our greed, our prejudices.
"It is always a simple matter to drag the people along,
whether it is a democracy, a
fascist
dictatorship, a parliament or a
communist
dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the
people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. All you have to do is tell them they are
being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of
patriotism and exposing the country to
. It works the same in any country." -
Hermann Goering
Communism is, by
definition, total government. Socialism
is defined as government ownership and/or control
over the basic means of production and distribution of goods and services or
total government. If you have total government it makes little difference
whether you call it communism,
socialism,
corporatism or
fascism.
Corporatism is defined as corporate
ownership and/or control over the basic means of
production and distribution of goods and services, also total government run by
corporations. When analyzed
this means corporate
control over everything, including you. (Just in
case, corporatists have a privately owned and
operated jail cell waiting for you!)
"Our chief foe is a swarm of greed-driven, self-absorbed,
mean-spirited
locust-like human beings who are
dedicated to "reforming" and perpetuating corporatism, the very system that has
led us to this woeful state of environmental, economic, social, and political affairs.
Corporatism, the
systemization of greed,
selfishness, subjugation, and
exploitation camouflaged by
the narcotic of consumerism, the
irresistible illusion of equal opportunity for all, and its ostensible
compatibility with liberal democracy,
has seduced hundreds of millions of people into ignoring its contradictions,
injustices, and malevolence.
Corporatism has inflicted deep wounds upon
the Earth and is the persistent infection that must be
eradicated to avert the sixth
mass extinction, the ongoing torture and murder of billions of non-human
animals, an acceleration of climate change,
further economic collapse, mass starvation,
severe shortages of potable water, perpetual resource wars,
and a host of other catastrophic events." - Jason Miller
The
idea that corporatism is
a share-the-wealth program is
strictly a con-fidence game to get the populace to surrender their
freedom to an
all-powerful collectivist corporate
monopoly.
Sycophants are told they are building a paradise on Earth when
actually they are constructing a jail for
themselves. Americans have been indoctrinated
to believe that corporatism is a share-the-wealth program.
If one understands that corporatism is
not a share-the-wealth program, but is in reality a
method to consolidate and control
wealth, then the seeming paradox of super-rich
men promoting corporatism,
communism,
socialism or
fascism becomes no
paradox at all. Instead
corporatism,
communism,
socialism or
fascism become the logical rational tools of
power-seeking soulless
apostate
megalomaniacs.
In The Shame
of the Cities, a study of the American
political system in 1904, Lincoln Steffens concluded
that the corruption and failures of
American democracy
stemmed largely from a single source -
the control of government by businessmen acting in
their own self-interest. Lincoln Steffens characterized that formula as a
category of
treason because "the effect of it
is literally to change the form of
government from one that is
representative of the people to
an oligarchy representative of the special
interests."
To invoke Christianity to justify the
rape of the land
violates manifold
Christian precepts that require us to be
careful stewards of God's
creation. Rather than elevating the human
spirit "Wise Use"
neo-cons embrace
intolerance, selfishness, pride, arrogance toward creation, and irresponsibility to the community and
future generations.
- adapted from Robert F.
Kennedy, Jr. , Crimes Against Nature
In 2006 the consequences of
Gail Norton's actions as acting head of the
Department of the Interior became apparent. In 2002 after a eight year drought
water in the Klamath River was in short
supply. The farmers in the area sought a redistribution of the
water. Ecologists stated that if more
water was taken from the Klamath then there
was a possibility that the king salmon
would go into sharp decline. Federal officials declared a
commercial fishery failure
along 700 miles of the California and Oregon coast because of extremely low
counts of king salmon in August of 2006.
"The Pacific Fishery Management Council voted April 10, 2008 to cancel
the chinook fishing season in an effort to reverse the catastrophic
disappearance of California's fabled run of the pink fish popularly known as
king salmon." - John Koopman
We
can all thank Gail Norton for the extermination of
California king salmon. Thanks
Gail!
"The George W. Bush administration is
totally hostile toward the idea of stewardship of
the our public lands." - Sari Reznick
To claim the approach of the
rapture, Jesus' return to Earth with a flaming sword of judgement, allows humanity to destroy God's creation because we
will not need it in the non-existent future is an evil
precept that does not emanate from
God but from the minds of
evil men with no empathy for
life.
Government
regulation is necessary in our
modern complex society for a true
free market economy
to work correctly and efficiently.
Regulations designed to create a
viable, vibrant truly free market by having
multiple providers of goods or services compete on a level playing field are
desirable.
If a monopolizing interest takes
control of a resource then the
free market will
fail to function as a
free market.
If a provider of goods and services is
subsidized then the
free market will fail
to function as a free
market.
Government regulation, at some level dependent on
the specific industry, is required to assure that multiple providers of goods
and services exist and that they compete with each
other on a level playing field.
When an
industry fails
to assure the safety of marketed products or
fails to provide a service as
marketed then that
industry has become egregiously
socially irresponsible. The
industry forfeits its right to
self-policing and must submit to
regulation by a government entity
if it wishes to retain it's government charter. (In the past when a
corporation became egregiously
socially irresponsible its
charter was revoked!)
Economically it
is better for all concerned if industry
actually rigorously polices itself.
Poorly designed and implemented government
regulation may stifle the internal
balancing mechanisms of the
free
market.
On the other hand when an
industry is
subsidized or
monopolized the simple fact is that
the free market
fails to function correctly and efficiently and that
industry will not keep pace with
changing conditions and will fall into decline.
The
American automotive
industry is a good example of an
American industry that has continually
failed to be socially responsible and has thus
fallen into decline.
If the American
automotive industry had
successfully policed itself then it is not likely that
General Motors, the Ford Motor Company and the Chrysler Group, basically a
three member cartel, would hold only 48.1 percent of the
American new auto - cars and trucks -
sales market in July 2007 when foreign auto
companies for the first time held more than half the
market at 51.9 percent.
"Detroit likes to claim that making cars
more efficient is too costly, requires changes that
consumers won't accept or would compromise
safety, or that the technology isn't here yet. The auto
industry opposed shatterproof
windshields, seat belts, upholstered dashboards, safety locks, inside trunk
locks, air bags, then smart air bags, catalytic converters, emission-control
devices, energy-absorbing steering wheels, head restraints,
nickel-metal hydride batteries, California
zero emission vehicle mandate and changes to the corporate average fuel
economy. Only legislation can move Detroit." - John Spradley
Foreign
auto companies embraced efficiency and safety above and beyond legislatively
set regulation and now those same
foreign auto companies hold over half the American
domestic market in new car and truck sales. While
American automotive companies fought
regulation as too expensive foreign
auto companies proved that making a better product increases
market share regardless of
regulation.
"Regulations - such as those that
protect the environment from
destruction,
workers from
death and injury, and
consumers from faulty and products and exploitative
advertising - require
corporations, by law, to be socially and
environmentally responsible,
rather than trusting and hoping that they will be. They reflect decisions about
appropriate standards for corporate
behavior that are made by an institution -
government - whose sole
purpose, unlike the
corporation's, is to protect and
promote the public interest and
reflect the people's will. Government
regulation, unlike
market-based solutions, combines authority, capacity, and
democratic legitimacy to protect citizens from
corporate misdeeds. Through it,
governments can pursue social values - such as democracy, social
justice, citizens' health and welfare,
environmental integrity,
cultural identity - that lie beyond the narrow goals
of self-interest and
wealth maximization that dictate the behavior of
corporations and
markets." - Joe Balkan
canary in a coal mine
Farmington Mine Disaster happened on
November 20, 1968, at the Consol No. 9 coal mine near Farmington, West
Virginia. 78 miners perished. Laws that were then enacted have largely been
abandoned by the new leaner and meaner mine owners of the 21st century.
Thirteen coal miners died as the result of two gas
explosions September 23, 2001 at the Jim
Walter Resources Blue Creek No. 5 Mine in Brookwood, Alabama.
On
January 2, 2006, in the Sago Mine in Sago, West Virginia a blast and ensuing
aftermath trapped thirteen miners for nearly two days. Only one miner survived. International Coal Group is the
non-union coal operator of the Sago Mine.
On May 20, 2006 five miners
at the non-union Kentucky Darby Mine No. 1 in Harlan County, state of Kentucky,
died after a methane explosion inside a
shaft. On May 24, 2006 a miner underground at International Coal Group's
Sycamore II Mine near Jarvisville, state of West Virginia, died when he was
struck in the head by a heavy wooden object.
On Jan 13, 2007 two
members of a coal mining crew removing pillars in a mine near Cucumber died
when a portion of the tunnel collapsed and the men were buried in debris deep
underground. The crew was working on
a process called retreat mining, a practice that involves cutting away support
pillars to extract the last coal deposits by working back toward the entrance while allowing
the ceiling to fall in. (see Jack Spadaro)
When
Robert Murray acquired a 50 percent ownership in the Crandall Canyon coal mine
in August, 2006, his company repeatedly petitioned the Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA) to allow coal to be extracted from the north and south
barriers - thick walls of coal that ran on both sides of the main tunnels left
by design to hold up the ceilings.
Documents on file with the Utah
Division of Oil Gas and Mining show Andalex, the prior owner, had previously
decided not to mine those barriers, determining it posed a risk to worker
safety.
In February and March of 2007, the company did retreat mining
in the north barrier. Work in the north barrier progressed until March, when
the mine suffered a collapse - the tunnel roof fell in, the tunnel floors
heaved and coal exploded from the support pillars due to the pressure of the
mountain bearing down. The collapse damaged tunnels over a span of more than
700 feet, and prompted mine operators to abandon retreat mining in the northern
barrier.
On June 15, 2007, the company received approval from the Mine
Safety and Health Administration to begin cutting away the support pillars of
the south barrier. On August 6 six miners - Kerry Allred, Don Erickson, Luis
Hernandez, Juan Carlos Payan, Brandon Phillips and Manuel Sanchez - were
retreat mining in that south barrier when a 69 acre section collapsed. On
August 16 Dale Ray Black, Brandon Kimber and Gary Jensen were killed in another
collapse while attempting a rescue. According to 1400 pages of government and
congressional records the Crandall Canyon mine was expected to
collapse.
Ken Ward Jr. of The Charleston Gazette (W.Va.) analyzed
government reports and data and found that 9 out of every 10 coal mining deaths
nationwide over the last 10 years could have been avoided if existing safety
rules had been followed.
Seth Borenstein, Linda J. Johnson and Lee
Mueller of Knight Ridder Newspapers used federal data to find that since
the Bush administration took office in 2001, it has been more lenient toward
mining companies facing serious safety violations, issuing fewer and smaller
major fines and collecting less than half of the money that violators
owed.
In July 20, 2005 the Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Protection announced it will take up to 60 years and $15 billion
to clean up 250,000 acres of land and over 2100 miles of
streams contaminated by abandoned coal mines
in Pennsylvania.
"It is a sign of progress that
America is beginning to face the coal-hard truth about burning black "chunks of
solid carbon" to meet our insatiable hunger for electricity. Feeding a ravenous
coal-fired power plant requires stripping huge swaths of land each and every
year. To feed our energy appetites, we flatten mountains, wrench
soil-stabilizing trees from the ground, devour purple mountains majesty and
bury streams under toxic tons of rubble." - Linda Nicholas
"People
across the country are deciding that coal's multiple bad effects are real,
cumulative, permanent and largely ignored in Washington. Coal is the main
reason the United States is the world's largest source of greenhouse gases. The
ready availability and relatively low cost (to the power generator), and the
fact that we have always done it this way, gave coal a safe place in the market
for 125 years and created a large body of well-financed special-interest
groups." - Robert Siebert
The industry sponsored front group the
Federation for American Coal, Energy and Security which debuted in the summer
of 2009 as a product of the Adfero Group, a public relation corporation working
for Koch Industries and the US Chamber of Commerce.
refinery on
fireThe accuracy of government safety statistics is undermined by
the fact that many workers are now
hired by or through independent contractors.
Long considered one of the
nation's most dangerous industries, oil refining suddenly seemed one of the
safest when the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics reported no refinery
deaths in 2002 or 2003. At least nine people were asphyxiated, burned or fell
to their deaths at our nation's refineries during those years, according to
media accounts, industry statistics and fatal accident reports to the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
"They'll show up in the
statistics but not as refinery workers.
The more dangerous an occupation, the less likely a company would want to hire
those people directly - they want to boost their own safety rates and decrease
their liability." - retired Bureau of Labor Statistics
economist Guy Toscano
The way the
United States safety statistics are now kept, a work site will not generally get a black mark if
contractors from other companies are killed or injured there - only if a
permanent employee dies or gets hurt.
"If the site gets picked up, it's
going to be almost a fluke." - former OSHA Administrator Patrick Tyson
Hazardous industries such as steel, are increasingly contracting out their more
dangerous jobs to make the primary corporation look safer.
Terry Brimer
fell when a corroded railing gave way at the Indiana refinery in 2004. OSHA
fined the company $1,625.
"I have a British Petroleum paper that says we will
provide our employees with a safe work
environment, but there wasn't
one for my husband. I don't feel like a $1,625 fine is enough of a motivator
for them." - Naomi Brimer
British
Petroleum West Coast Products agreed to fines, health programs and
improvements totaling a record $81 million for thousands of
pollution violations over the
past decade at its Carson, California oil refinery.
"Since
British Petroleum failed to identify and
inspect as many as half the components in its facility during the last decade,
emissions might be as much as double previous totals." - AQMD chief counsel
Peter Mieras
The 15 worker
deaths at the British Petroleum refinery in
Texas City, Texas on March 23, 2005 could have been prevented according to a
report by the United Steelworkers.
"If the company had taken the
union's advice to pipe the atmospheric vent where the hydrocarbons were
released to the flare system there would have been no fire and if the
company had not violated its own policy and issued themselves a variance in
order to place the trailer in a dangerous unit there would have been no
deaths." - United Steel Workers Region 6 Director Gary Beevers
The
United States Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board, one of several
agencies looking into the blast, has said internal
British Petroleum documents show that budget
cuts of 25 percent from 1998 through 2000 caused a progressive deterioration of
safety at the refinery.
"British
Petroleum has admitted they were responsible. The issue is what level of
knowledge did they have in advance. Those issues
are still out there." - Brent Coon, Eva Rowe's attorney - Eva Rowe's parents,
48-year-old James Rowe and his wife, Linda Rowe, 47, of Hornbeck, La., were two
of the 15 killed.
British Petroleum
agreed to pay $50 million in fines and plead guilty to a felony for it's role
in the refinery fire.
In October 2009 OSHA fined British Petroleum $87
million for failing to correct deficiencies that lead to the 2005 explosion and
fire that killed 15 workers. OSHA issued 271 notifications to BP for failing to
correct hazards at the Texas City refinery over the four-year period since the
explosion and fire. OSHA is issuing fines of $56.7 million for "failure to
correct." In addition, OSHA also identified 439 willful and
egregious violations of industry-accepted safety controls at the
refinery. Those violations will lead to $30.7 million in additional
fines.(Business as usual! Often it is much
cheaper for corporations to pay fines than to comply with regulations.
And we must never forget the only
purpose of a corporation is to increase shareholder wealth.
Workers deaths are just another
cost of the drive to increase shareholder wealth.
)
The John M. Olin Foundation
closed in November 2005. The New York-based John M. Olin Foundation ,
grew out of a family manufacturing business (chemical and munitions),
funded right-wing "think tanks" including the American Enterprise Institute, the
Heritage
Foundation and the Manhattan Institute for Public Policy
Research.
Defenders of Property
Rights were Robert Bork; Larry Craig, United States Senator from Idaho;
Orrin Hatch, United States Senator from Utah; Ed Meese, Attorney General under
Reagan, 1985-88; Richard Pombo, Congressman, California 11th; Lamar Smith,
Congressman, Texas 21st
Citizens for Sensible
Control of Acid Rain (CSCAR) operated between 1983 and 1991 to oppose
tightening the Clean Air Act. In a 1986 letter sent to more than 600,000
constituents, CSCAR claimed that the acid rain bill would cost some $110
billion to industry and utilities and
increase the electricity rate by 30 percent.
Citizens for Sensible
Control of Acid Rain was funded by
the coal and electric industry. Specific companies included: American Cyanamid
Co., Consolidation Coal Co., Indianapolis Power and Light Co., Jersey Central
Power and Light Co., Metropolitan Edison Co., Ohio Edison Co., Pennsylvania
Electric Co., Peabody Holding Co., Southern Co., Services Union Electric Co.
The Advancement of Sound Science Coalition
(TASSC) is a now defunct industry funded
PR front group run by the APCO Worldwide public relations firm which worked to
hang the label of "junk science" on environmentalists. Created in 1993, TASSC
began as a front for Philip Morris which was attempting to discredit ETS
(Environmental Tobacco Smoke) research as a long-term cause of increased
cancer and heart problem rates in
the community - especially among office workers and children
living with smoking parents. TASSC advanced
industry-friendly positions on a wide range of topics, including
global warming, smoking,
phthalates, and
pesticides. |
|
back to stacks
contents
 |
This web site is not a commercial web site and
is presented for educational purposes only.
This website defines a new religious
ideology to which its author adheres. The author feels that the falsification
of reality outside personal experience has created a populace unable to discern
propaganda from reality and that this has been done purposefully by an
international corporate cartel through their agents who wish to foist a corrupt
version of reality on the human race. Religious intolerance occurs when any
group refuses to tolerate religious practices, religious beliefs or persons due
to their religious ideology. This web site marks the founding of the religion
aptly named The Truth of the Way of Life - a rational religion based on reason
which requires no leap of faith, accepts no tithes, has no supreme leader, no
church buildings and in which each and every individual is encouraged to
develop a personal relation with God through the pursuit of the knowledge of
reality in the hope of curing the spiritual corruption that has enveloped the
human spirit. The tenets of The Truth of the Way of Life are spelled out in
detail on this web site by the author. Violent acts against individuals due to
their religious beliefs in America is considered a hate
crime.
This web site in no way condones violence. To the contrary
the intent here is to reduce the violence that is already occurring due to the
international corporate cartels desire to control the human race. The
international corporate cartel already controls the world central banking
system, mass media worldwide, the industrial military entertainment complex of
America and is responsible for the collapse of morals, the elevation of
self-centered behavior and the destruction of global ecosystems. Civilization
is based on cooperation. Cooperation does not occur at the point of a
gun.
American social mores and values have declined precipitously over
the last century as the corrupt international cartel has garnered more and more
power. This power rests in the ability to deceive the populace in general
through mass media by pressing emotional buttons which have been preprogrammed
into the population through prior mass media psychological operations. The
results have been the destruction of the family and the destruction of social
structures that do not adhere to the corrupt international elites vision of a
perfect world. Through distraction and coercion the direction of thought of the
bulk of the population has been directed toward solutions proposed by the
corrupt international elite that further consolidates their power and which
further their purposes.
All views and opinions presented on this web
site are the views and opinions of individual human men and women that, through
their writings, showed the capacity for intelligent, reasonable, rational,
insightful and unpopular thought. All factual information presented on this web
site is believed to be true and accurate and is presented as originally
presented in print media which may or may not have originally presented the
facts truthfully. Opinion and thoughts have been adapted, edited, corrected,
redacted, combined, added to, re-edited and re-corrected as nearly all opinion
and thought has been throughout time but has been done so in the spirit of the
original writer with the intent of making his or her thoughts and opinions
clearer and relevant to the reader in the present time.
Fair Use Notice
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has
not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making
such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal
justice, human rights, political, economic, democratic,
scientific, and social justice
issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted
material as provided for in section 107 of the United States Copyright Law. In
accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is
distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving the included information for
research and educational
purposes. For more information see: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If
you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own
that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
|
Copyright
© Lawrence Turner All Rights Reserved |