
|
"There is no wealth but
life." - John Ruskin
The Miser and the Angel of
Death
A miser had accumulated, by effort, trade and lending,
three hundred thousand dinars.
The tightwad had lands and buildings,
and all kinds of wealth.
The penny-pincher then decided that he would
spend a year in enjoyment, living comfortably, and then decide as to what
his future should be.
But, almost as soon as he had stopped amassing
money, the Angel of Death appeared before him, to take his life away.
The miser tried, by every argument which he could muster, to
dissuade the Angel, who seemed, however, adamant.
Then the man said:
'Grant me but three more days, and I will give you one third of my
possessions.'
The Angel refused, and pulled again at the miser's life,
tuggging to take it away.
Then the moneygrubber said: 'If you will only
allow me two more days on earth, I will give you two hundred thousand
dinars from my store.'
But the Angel would not listen to him.
And the Angel even refused to give the man a solitary extra day for
all his three hundred thousand pieces.
Then the miser said: 'Please,
then, give me just time enough to write one little thing down.'
This
time the Angel allowed him this single concession. The tightwad wrote, with his
own blood:
'Man, make use of your life. I could
buy not one hour for three hundred thousand dinars. Make sure that you realize
the value of your time.' -
Farid al-Din Attar of Nishapur
"When wealth is separate from accumulation but
refers to a richness of relationships, each person's
wealth makes everyone wealthier." -
Charles
Eisenstein Wealth
is defined as:
A great amount; a profusion.
Property that
has economic utility.
The quality of
profuse abundance.
The state of being rich; affluence.
An
abundance of valuable material
possessions or
resources; riches.
All
goods and resources having value
in terms of exchange or use.
Large quantity of possessions; a
comparative abundance of things which are
objects of human
desire.
Economics; in the
private
sense, all property which has a money
value; in the public sense,
all objects, especially material objects, which have
economic utility.
Those
energies, faculties, and habits directly contributing
to make humans industrially efficient.
"If you look at the correlates of
happiness across the human
population, you
learn a few important things.
First of all, wealth is a poor predictor of happiness.
Wealth is not a useless predictor,
but it is quite limited.
The first $40,000 or so buys you almost all of
the happiness you can get from wealth.
The
difference between earning nothing and earning $20,000 is enormous - that's
the difference between having shelter and food and being
homeless and hungry.
Economists have shown that after
basic needs are met, there is not much 'marginal utility' to increased
wealth.
In other
words, the difference between a guy who makes $15,000
and a guy who makes $40,000 is much bigger than the difference between the guy
who makes $100,000 and the guy who makes $1,000,000.
Psychologists, philosophers, and religious leaders are a
little too quick to say that money can not buy happiness, and that really betrays a
failure to understand what it is like to
live on the streets with an empty
stomach.
Money makes a big difference to people who have none.
On the other hand, once
basic needs are met, further wealth does not create further
happiness.
So the relationship between money and
happiness is complicated, and definitely not
linear.
If it were linear, then
billionaires would be a thousand
times happier than millionaires, who would be a hundred times
happier than professors.
That clearly
isn't the case.
On the other hand, social relationships are a
powerful predictor of happiness - much more so
than money is.
Happy people have extensive
social networks and good
relationships with the people in those networks.
What is interesting to me is that while money is weakly and
complexly correlated with
happiness, and social
relationships are strongly and simply correlated
with happiness, most Americans spend most of their time trying to be happy by
pursuing wealth.
Why?
Individuals and
societies do not have the same
fundamental needs.
Individuals want to be
happy, and
commercialized
societies want
individuals to
consume.
Most
Americans do not feel personally responsible for
stoking America's economic engine; Americans feel personally responsible for increasing
their own well-being.
These different goals present a
real dilemma, and
commercialized
society cunningly solves
it by 'educating' Americans - consumption brings happiness.
Corporate controlled consumer society
convinces Americans that what is
good for the economy is
good for us individually.
This message is delivered to
Americans by every
magazine, television, newspaper, and
billboard, at every bus stop,
grocery store, and airport.
This message
finds us in our cars, it's made its way onto our clothing.
Happiness, Americans
learn, is just around the
corner and it requires that we
consume just one more thing.
And
then just one thing more after that.
So Americans do, we find out that the
happiness of consumption is thin and fleeting, and
rather than thinking to ourselves,
"Gosh, that promise of
happiness by consumption was a
lie,"
Americans instead think,
"Gosh, I must not have consumed
enough and I probably need just one small upgrade to my stereo, car, wardrobe,
or wife, and then I will be happy."
Americans
live in the
shadow of a great
lie, and by the time we figure out that it is a
lie we are closing in on
death and have become irrelevant
consumers, and a new generation of
young and relevant consumers takes our
place in the great chain of shopping."
-
Daniel Gilbert, professor of psychology at Harvard University and Director of
Harvards Hedonic Psychology Laboratory.
"To a very great extent
human history has been the story of the
unequal accumulation of harvested wealth, shifting from one center of
power to another, while always expanding the four
great inequalities.
The first farmers in
fertile regions taught themselves farming and storage methods that
created harvests beyond the needs of the day. Very
quickly warriors supported by
religious authority took power gathering these new
abundant harvests largely into their own hands, by means of taxes and direct
seizures. With this division of labor the subjugation of farmers by warriors and
priests was institutionalized, a subjugation that
has never ended. This was the first inequality.
Men established
a general domination over women and
their heirs. These are the second and third inequalities, of men over women and
men over children.
Added to the subjugation of farmers, women, and the family, was a forth inequality, of race or group,
leading to the subjugation of the most powerless peoples to
slavery.
This is
history.
Nowhere in
history has there ever been a great
civilization were the wealth of the harvests
created by all has been equitably distributed.
Power has been exerted wherever it can be, and
each successful coercion has done its
part to add to the general inequality, which has risen in direct proportion to
the wealth gathered; for wealth and power are much the
same. The possessors of the wealth in effect buy the
armed power they need to enforce the
growing inequality. And so the cycle continues.
The result has been
that while a small percentage of human beings have lived in a wealth of food,
material comfort, and learning, those not so lucky have been the functional
equivalent of domestic beasts, in harness to the
powerful and well-off, creating their wealth for them
but not benefitting from it themselves.
If you happen to be a young
black farm girl what can you say to the world, or
the world to you? You exist under all four of the great inequalities, and
will live a shortened life of ignorance, hunger, and fear. Indeed it only takes
one of the great inequalities to create such
conditions." - adapted from Kim Stanley
Robinson
"The only parental habit that
has a significant effect on the income of offspring is keeping a clean house.
Household cleanliness reflects an
overall ability and desire to maintain a
sense of order in a wide range of life activities. This trait is apparently shared to an
extent by the children of good housekeepers, causing them to have higher
incomes as adults." - Tom Hertz, American University
"If you don't have money you are second class." -
Joanne Minsky
The Five Hundred Gold Pieces One of Junaid's
disciple came to him with a purse containing five hundred gold pieces.
'Have you any more money than this?' asked the Sufi. 'Yes, I have,'
replied the disciple. 'Do you desire more?' asked the Sufi. 'Yes, I do,'
replied the disciple. 'Then you must keep it, for you are more in need than
I; for I have nothing and desire nothing. You have a great deal and still want
more.' - Farid al-Din Attar of Nishapur
"Very little is more stressful in modern life than
the acquisition of money. Money is a complex signifier in contemporary western
culture. It encompasses the movement of social patterns both towards desire and
away from social survival concerns. In tribal cultures, survival and desire are
linked to community and expulsion is the greatest fear. In contemporary
society, people are separated, while desire and fear are linked to jobs by way
of income. With such stress attached to money, convincing someone to spend
money means the communication to direct action requires a very strong emotional
appeal." - Edward Wilson & Wes Unruh
"Industry took to its conclusion
the separation from nature that started on the
psychological level with symbolic
culture and was projected onto the land with
agriculture.
Whereas these earlier developments reduced
reality to object, industry turned
object into commodity, time into money, and human being into
consumer.
Everything in the world
is being converted into money.
The conversion of all forms of wealth -
social, cultural,
spiritual and natural
- into money violates our sense of beauty, rightness,
and purpose. It has made the world uglier.
Just as the conversion of
the world to money makes less of the world, so does the conversion of
life to money (Time is money!)
make less of life.
Leibnitz' merciless phrase,
"Time is money," encapsulates a profound reduction
of everything into money - totally enslaving the human
spirit.
We have even sold off authentic
human relationship.
The more common wealth we
convert to money the more of our lives falls into the dichotomous realm of mine
or yours and the less common ground there is to share life and develop
unguarded relationships. The conversion of
life to money reduces
everything to an economic transaction, leaving us the loneliest people ever
to inhabit the earth. The conversion of everything
into money is unsustainable.
Anything you learn to do for yourself or
for other people, without paying for it; any utilization of recycled or
discarded materials; anything you make instead of buy, give instead of sell;
any new skill or new song or new art you teach yourself
or another, will reduce the
dominion of money. " - adapted from
Charles
Eisenstein "People
think they're going to be better off if they make
more money. What they don't take into account is that when they come home with
more money, all of a sudden they decide, 'Well, now I need a Lexus.'"- Richard
Easterlin
"Money is, however, an imaginary value, an
artificial creation of human speculation. It has
nothing to do with nature, nothing to do with
organic things; it has no
inner relation to the being of mankind. Money does not make a man
stronger, wiser or nobler; the capability alone,
conferred on it by the human imagination, of
possessing, not only buying power, but - in the form
of loan capital - power to
produce interest, has
invested it with an almost supernatural might."
- F. Roederich-Stoltheim (Theodor Fritsch)
"Ultimately there is only one question left to ask:
How will
money be distributed?
What if we look at the money
question from its
global perspective, and we try to
solve the whole
economic problem in order to
solve, once and for all, the problem of money?
Suppose we subordinate moral and individual problems to the collective
problem, to the total economic
system.
If a man is a thief, it is not his fault; his
economic conditions were such that he
could be nothing else.
If we accept this excuse on behalf of a poor
person, we must accept it for everyone.
Both the investment banker who
exploits workers and the smuggler who plays the black market are also involved
in impersonal economic conditions
which leave them no options.
As soon as we accept
the supremacy of global concerns and of the
system, as soon as we agree that material
conditions remove our freedom to choose, we absolve all individuals of all
responsibility for their use of money.
Seen in this
light, how can capitalism be more valid than
communism, or communism than capitalism?
The same error lies at the
heart of both: the flight from responsibility and the pursuit of an alibi.
When I want to talk about money, everyone hands me his system.
"If there is a money problem, it is because the economic system is
unsound."
All we need to do to solve the money problem is to change the
economic system.
This amounts to predicting that man will become just
and good, that he will know exactly what to do with his money, that he will no
longer covet his neighbor's possessions, that he will no longer steal, that he
will give up bribing women and public officials, that he will not be corrupted
by his own material good fortune, that he will sympathize with the needy, that
he will neither hoard his money nor waste it, that he will no longer dream of
"upward mobility," that he will not use his accumulated wealth to gain power in
society, that he will not use his money to humiliate others.
Trying to
solve the problem of money through the total economic system is both an error
and an act of cowardice.
It is an error precisely because it refuses to
consider the human element in the problem. It is posited on the strict
neutrality of human nature, as
if human passion and evil were not factors in the problem of money and would
not always exist - as if capitalism or communism could be built in the abstract
without taking human nature
into account.
As theory,
Adam Smith's idea
of the harmony between private and public interests is perfectly valid. It
requires us, however, to consider human
nature in the abstract.
If
human nature is neutral (no
need to require it to be good), then
private and public interests agree. I accept that. But
human nature is not neutral.
And now, because people lust after money,
capitalism is turning into a machine for oppressing,
enslaving and hardening individuals.
There is no
theoretical reason for
capitalism not to produce an excellent structure. (Capitalism's goals, as
spelled out theoretically, are admirable. ) The problem is that, to the extent
that human nature cannot be changed, this
admirable structure will come to a miserable end because individuals will use
it, not in high-minded
scientific objectivity, but in a passionate
pursuit of power.
Capitialism becomes
corporitism which must therefore
enslave people, bind them with all
possible political and psychological constraints - through
police, work,
propaganda,
fear - to prevent them from giving free rein
to their wicked lust for money.
In the end, it might be possible for a dictatorship -
one that lasted for a very long time - to crush the human spirit
completely.
It is not unthinkable that
after three, four, ten generations of totalitarianism, individuals may indeed
be so crushed that they will have no more interest in money, no more passion of
any sort; they will simply conform to the model the syndicate of the soulless
has set for them.
If the problem of money is eventually
solved, it will have nothing to do with the
excellence of the new economic regime; it will
instead be a result of a dictatorship which finally breaks the human
spirit." - Jacques Ellul 1984
Woe to those who build iniquity and violence, and
lay deceit as a foundation; for quickly they will be overthrown, and they will
have no peace. (1 Epistle of Enoch 94.6)
Woe to you, rich, for in your riches you have
trusted; from your riches you will depart, because you have not remembered the
Most High in the days of your riches. (1 Epistle of Enoch 94.8)
Although most Americans
would deny that American culture worships
wealth, aka money or material riches, actions speak louder than
words and the truth is that
the American Dream is not what it once was.
"Money never made a man happy yet, nor will it. There is nothing in its
nature to produce happiness. The more a man has, the more he wants.
Instead of filling a vacuum, it makes one." - Benjamin Franklin
Images of dollar
bills, fantasies of wealth and wads of money
arouse feelings of
self-sufficiency that result in
selfish and often
antisocial
behavior. Money makes it
possible for people to achieve their goals without having to ask friends or
acquaintances for help. Even subtle reminders of money inspires people to be
self-reliant - and to expect such
behavior from
others.
"Money changes
people's motivations. They are less focused on
other people. In this sense, money
can be a barrier to social intimacy." - Nicole
Mead
"Money is easy to make if it is money you want. But
with few exceptions people do not want money. They want luxury and they want
love and they want admiration." -
John Steinbeck
Matthew 6:24 (spoken by Jesus)"No one can serve
two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be
devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve
God and money." - English Standard
"No one
can serve two masters. Either he will hate the one and love the other, or he
will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both
God and money." - New International
"No-one
can serve two masters. Either he will hate the one and love the other, or he
will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both
God and money." - New International UK
"No
one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or
you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both
God and money." - Today's New International
"No man can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one, and
love the other; or else he will hold to one, and despise the other. Ye cannot
serve God and
mammon." - American Standard
"No
one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other,
or he will be devoted to one and despise the other. You cannot serve
God and wealth." - New American Standard
"You can't worship two gods at once. Loving one god, you'll end up
hating the other. Adoration of one feeds contempt for the other. You can't
worship God and
money both." - The Message
"No
one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other,
or he will stand by and be devoted to the one and despise and be against the
other. You cannot serve God and
mammon (deceitful riches,
money, possessions, or materialism.)" -
Amplified
"No one can serve two masters. For you will hate one and love
the other; you will be devoted to one and despise the other. You cannot serve
both God and
money." - New Living Translation
"No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and
love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye
cannot serve God and
mammon." - King James
"No one
can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or
else he will be loyal to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve
God and mammon." - New King James
"No man
can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or
else he will hold to the one and despise the other. Ye cannot serve
God and mammon." - 21st Century King James
"You cannot be the slave of two masters! You will like one more than
the other or be more loyal to one than the other. You cannot serve both
God and money." - Contemporary English Version
"None is able to serve two lords, for either he will hate the one and
love the other, or he will hold to the one, and despise the other; ye are not
able to serve God and
mammon." - Young's Literal
"No
one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and will love the
other, or he will hold to the one and despise the other. Ye cannot serve
God and mammon." - Darby
"No one can have
two bosses. He will hate the one and love the other. Or he will listen to the
one and work against the other. You cannot have both
God and riches as your boss at the same time." -
New Life
"No one can be a slave of two masters, since either he will
hate one and love the other, or be devoted to one and despise the other. You
cannot be slaves of God and of
money." - Holman Christian Standard
"No one can serve two masters at the same time. He will hate one of
them and love the other. Or he will be faithful to one and dislike the other.
You can't serve God and
money at the same time." - New
International Reader's
"No man may serve two lords, for either he shall
hate the one, and love the other; either he shall sustain the one [or he shall
sustain the one], and despise the other. Ye be not able to serve
God and riches." - Wycliff
"No man can work
for two masters. He will hate one and love the other. Or he will obey one and
despise the other. You cannot work for both God and money." - Worldwide English
"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the
tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home
from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick
the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may
posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. -Samuel
AdamsThe worship of Mammon requires the profit driven behavior of
corporatism. This disease started when the British Crown granted exclusive
rights of trade with India to the British East India Company, a joint stock
corporation. British East India Company raped India stealing Indian wealth and
impoverishing the Indian people forcing them from their ancestral village homes
to work plantations carved out of jungle.
Later came Standard Oil,
which controlled 70% of the world market in oil by 1890. The same Standard Oil
(Exxon now ExxonMobil) that later provided the Germans with the ability to
synthesize oil from coal and the formula for tetraethyl lead for aviation fuel.
Germany could not have fought the WWII without these gifts from Standard Oil.
You see, the corporatists play both sides in war as profits are to be made and
the worship of Mammon requires substantial profit streams.
A
corporation can be socially responsible but only if that social responsibility
is written into the corporate charter.
Unfortunately the worshipers of
Mammon shun investment in socially responsible corporations. The people of
Earth and the Earth itself are being consumed by concept in the form of a legal
construct - the corporation. The people of Earth must throw off the shackles of
ingrained conditioned parochial thinking and come up with socially responsible
ways of caring for ourselves that does not rely on the psychopathological
methods of externalization of costs employed by the corporatists.
After
all the psychopathological reality of the corporation is impoverishing the vast
majority of the peoples of Earth and is killing vast quantities of life on
Earth in the sixth great extinction.
personal wealth through theft
"He who has a purse full of gold has a place like
the light of men's eyes. As the goldsmith's son so well put it: 'The noble
is the man who has gold nobles.'" - Saadi of Shiraz Neil
Kadisha was listed on the Forbes 400 list in 2001.
Over an eight year
span Neil Kadisha raided the trust funds of Dafna Uzyel, a widowed family
friend'.
Luckily for Neil Kadisha he was able to
transform a $6.2 million trust fund into
over $900 million as a director of Qualcomm Inc.
Neil Kadisha was
ordered to pay Dafna Uzyel $100 million in a civil trial that ended after 4
years in January 2007.
"Kadisha was no more than a common thief in his
monumental takings of money for his use and benefit." - presiding Superior
Court judge Henry W. Shatford
Henry W. Shatford found that Neil Kadisha
had looted the trust funds covering his tracks with backdated records,
fraudulent accounting and phony transactions. The $300,000 borrowed' from
Dafna Uzyel that Neil Kadisha loaned Qualcomm Inc. in 1988 allowed Qualcomm
Inc. to make Neil Kadisha a wealthy man before the inappropriately labeled
dot-com crash of 2000.
Nearly all the individuals that are extremely
wealthy started out with investable capital.
Sometimes it was not their
own as in the case of Neil Kadisha.
It takes money to make money.
And then there was Bernie Madoff. |
|
back to stacks
contents
 |
This web site is not a commercial web site and
is presented for educational purposes only.
This website defines a new religious
ideology to which its author adheres. The author feels that the falsification
of reality outside personal experience has created a populace unable to discern
propaganda from reality and that this has been done purposefully by an
international corporate cartel through their agents who wish to foist a corrupt
version of reality on the human race. Religious intolerance occurs when any
group refuses to tolerate religious practices, religious beliefs or persons due
to their religious ideology. This web site marks the founding of the religion
aptly named The Truth of the Way of Life - a rational religion based on reason
which requires no leap of faith, accepts no tithes, has no supreme leader, no
church buildings and in which each and every individual is encouraged to
develop a personal relation with God through the pursuit of the knowledge of
reality in the hope of curing the spiritual corruption that has enveloped the
human spirit. The tenets of The Truth of the Way of Life are spelled out in
detail on this web site by the author. Violent acts against individuals due to
their religious beliefs in America is considered a hate
crime.
This web site in no way condones violence. To the contrary
the intent here is to reduce the violence that is already occurring due to the
international corporate cartels desire to control the human race. The
international corporate cartel already controls the world central banking
system, mass media worldwide, the industrial military entertainment complex of
America and is responsible for the collapse of morals, the elevation of
self-centered behavior and the destruction of global ecosystems. Civilization
is based on cooperation. Cooperation does not occur at the point of a
gun.
American social mores and values have declined precipitously over
the last century as the corrupt international cartel has garnered more and more
power. This power rests in the ability to deceive the populace in general
through mass media by pressing emotional buttons which have been preprogrammed
into the population through prior mass media psychological operations. The
results have been the destruction of the family and the destruction of social
structures that do not adhere to the corrupt international elites vision of a
perfect world. Through distraction and coercion the direction of thought of the
bulk of the population has been directed toward solutions proposed by the
corrupt international elite that further consolidates their power and which
further their purposes.
All views and opinions presented on this web
site are the views and opinions of individual human men and women that, through
their writings, showed the capacity for intelligent, reasonable, rational,
insightful and unpopular thought. All factual information presented on this web
site is believed to be true and accurate and is presented as originally
presented in print media which may or may not have originally presented the
facts truthfully. Opinion and thoughts have been adapted, edited, corrected,
redacted, combined, added to, re-edited and re-corrected as nearly all opinion
and thought has been throughout time but has been done so in the spirit of the
original writer with the intent of making his or her thoughts and opinions
clearer and relevant to the reader in the present time.
Fair Use Notice
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has
not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making
such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal
justice, human rights, political, economic, democratic, scientific, and social
justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such
copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the United States
Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on
this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposes. For more information see: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If
you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own
that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
|
Copyright
© Lawrence Turner All Rights Reserved |