Genetically Modified Organism
Genetic engineering is based on a false
understanding of the genome.
Beadle and Tatum receive the
Nobel Prize in Physiology, a disastrous error, for demonstrating
genes regulate chemical processes, one gene = one protein
Human Genome project proves:
one gene = one protein theory incorrect.
The history of genetically modified
organisms is inseparable from political history -
Nelson, Laurance and
John D. Rockefeller III.
In the three decades following American victory in
World War II
four riders of the GMO
apocalypse shaped the evolution of power
determined at all costs to bring the
entire world under their sway.
George Frost Kennan,
Henry R. Luce,
Averell Harriman and
the Rockefeller brothers, create
the concept of multinational
Henry R. Luce can be
considered a founding father of authoritarianism.
Henry R. Luce, the creator of
Fortune and later of Sports Illustrated, was a media tycoon at a
time when, as AJ Liebling put it, freedom of
the press belonged to the man
who owned one, a time when a lone
publisher could aspire to influence the course of world events.
Henry R. Luce advanced the cause of
American intervention in the world,
up to and including an unrelenting
passion for the misadventure in Vietnam.
Henry R. Luce called "journalism of
information with a purpose" is hard to distinguish from propaganda, and it
won him the scorn of intellectuals.
Henry R. Luce is instrumental
in the idea of controlling cancer.
The Rockefeller's finance the "Green
Revolution" in the agriculture sector of developing countries to create new
markets for farm equipment,
fertilizers and petroleum
products, as well as to expand
dependency on petroleum products.
Their actions are
inseparable from the
story of genetically modified crops.
Horizontal gene transfer
involves injecting a gene from one species into a completely different species,
yielding unexpected and unpredictable results.
This is also the history
of implant/transplant medicine and
Iraq War: Monsanto, Cargill & Dow Chemical Take Over Iraqi
2015 10 things the green
revolution did to consider:
1) 41 to 100% decrease in vit A in
apples, bananas, broccoli, onions, potatoes and tomatoes. Both onion and potato
saw a 100% percent loss of vitamin A between 1951 and 1999.
with depleted anti-oxidants and contaminated with toxic heavy metals.
3) 34,000 pesticides registered in the US to be applied to crops.
4) 31 pesticides in the EU that should be banned but have not been due
to industry pressure.
5) Agribusiness/chemical products wiping out
pollinating insects essential to our food chain.
companies (often integrated with agribiz companies) raking in massive profits
to allegedly treat the diseases that have emerged.
7) Rises in asthma,
autism and learning disabilities, birth defects, reproductive dysfunction,
diabetes, Parkinsons and Alzheimers diseases and several types of
cancer that correlate with rises in exposure to pesticides.
pioneered the green revolution in India. Now a cancer epicentre
with depleted and contaminated water tables. India losing 5,334 million tonnes
of soil every year due indiscreet and excessive use of fertilisers,
9) Research in the UK concluding UK farms only have 100
more harvests left due to soil degradation.
10) Agribusiness making
1976 National Institutes of
Health (NIH) establish guidelines for biotech research.
National Institutes of Health guidelines
rely on the industry self-regulation as
NIH is an advisory and not a regulatory
1977 through 1978 As large corporations
become involved in genetic engineering, NIH
guidelines make accommodations for field tests and
mass production of
genetically engineered organisms.
16 bills to regulate genetic
research are introduced in US Congress.
guidelines - which deal primarily with medical and pharmaceutical research and
do not take a precautionary
approach - remain the sole regulatory mechanism for biotech
early 1980s Biotech corporations are
developing genetically engineered
plants, animal drugs, and
livestock, but no system is in
place to regulate the development, sale, or use of these
bioengineered products, including
White House Office of
Science and Technology Policy join the biotech industry in opposing strong
regulations and oversight by federal agencies.
1986 Biotech regulatory framework policy
founded on the corporate-generated assertion that bioengineering is just an
extension of traditional plant and animal breeding, and
bioengineered products did
not differ fundamentally from non-engineered organisms and yet patents are
granted on precisely the fact that these genetically modified organisms differ
fundamentally from non-engineered organisms !
Food and Drug
Adminstration tasked with regulating
organisms in food and drugs.
The Department of Agriculture
tasked with regulating genetically engineered plants
Environmental Protection Agency tasked with
regulating genetically engineered organisms released into the
environment for pest control.
National Institutes of
Health tasked with examining
organisms that could affect public health.
These regulations are
founded on the false premise that bioengineered organisms used for food and
agricultural products are no different from non-engineered, conventional
In fact, to produce genetically engineered foods, researchers
take genes from food or non-food organisms and add them to another organism to
alter its genetic makeup in ways not possible through sexual reproduction as
used in animal
husbandry or cross-breeding plant species.
process' delete essential proteins and/or add entirely new ones modifing
genetic characteristics in entirely unexpected ways.
As long as genes
come from an approved food
source, the government treats new or altered genes in bioengineered foods
as "natural", not novel, additives.
In most cases
regulators are not required to take a precautionary approach when evaluating
new genetically engineered food products; products are considered safe until proven
to determine the long-term health consequences of new products are not
Historically corporations have submitted fraudulent test
results showing products are safe or have simply withheld studies indicating
Corporate safety studies as
knowledge, are not available for public scrutiny.
Inserting a gene
creates rogue proteins.
Rogue proteins are allergenic and
toxic as the organism has
no naturally evolved immunity to it.
No long-term feeding studies have
been perform in the US or Canada to demonstrate the claims that engineered corn
or soy are safe.
Scientific studies out of
Europe and Russia,
showing that rats fed engineered food die prematurely.
literature is full of studies showing that
engineered corn and soy
contain toxic allergenic proteins.
"Studies show that proteins produced by engineered
plants are different than what they should be. 2005 "The central dogma of molecular
biology, as faith-based and pervasive as that of any religion (maybe more so),
collapsed with the completion of the human genome project!
Inserting a gene in a
genome using this technology can and does result in damaged proteins.
refute claims of biotech companies that engineered crops yield more, that they
require less pesticide applications, that they have no impact on the
environment and of course that they are safe to eat." - Thierry Vrain
not even enough protein-coding genes to account for the about 100k different
proteins found in the human body." - Sayer Ji
2007 Top 3 genetically modified seed corporations (Monsanto,
account for $10.3 billion, or 47% of the worldwide proprietary seed market.
Monsanto accounts for almost one-quarter (23%) of the global
proprietary seed market.
87% of the total world area devoted to
genetically engineered seeds uses biotech seeds and traits engineered by
48% of the seed
revenue of DuPont comes from
products that carry a biotech trait.
The only technical achievement in
the engineering of crops is their ability to withstand a shower of chemical
Over 80% of the worldwide area devoted to genetically
engineered crops carry at least one genetic trait for herbicide
2009 Americans Feeding Americans
Emergency Caravan brings 13 semitrailers with more than $2.1 million worth
of food, enough to help sustain about 5,200 families for a week, to Elkhart,
Agriculture in Indiana is a large and diverse industry that
plays a vital role in the economic stability of Indiana, with 63,000 farms
containing 15,400,000 acres of farmland.
In 2001, cash receipts from
the sale of crops and livestock reached $5.1 billion. In the same year, Indiana
ranked 14th in the US in cash receipts from the sale of all commodities; crop
sales amounted to $3.2 billion; and livestock sales totaled $1.8 billion.
In 2002 the state produced over 631 million
bushels of corn for
grain, ranking 5th in the US.
Indiana also grew over 235 million
bushels of soybeans,
the 4th most in the nation.
The monoculture is unable
to feed the very people that it surrounds!
Regulations require corporations to submit reams of scientific
This gives the public the illusion new biotech products undergo
rigorous safety evaluations and are safe.
This also discourages
competition from smaller biotech and seed companies.
"There seemed to be
a trend in the place toward approval at any price. It went from a
university-like setting where there was independent scientific review to an
atmosphere of "approve, approve, approve." - Whistleblower Veterinarian Dr.
Richard Burroughs, FDA Center for Veterinary Sciences
Burroughs saw researchers drop sick cows from
rBGH test trials and
manipulate data to make health and safety problems disappear.
to Burroughs, the raw, untouched data hidden away behind the agency's doors and
protected as trade secrets would show otherwise.
Not only did the FDA
fail to act upon evidence that rBGH was not safe, the agency actually
promoted the product before
and after approval.
Margaret Miller, deputy director of the FDA Office of New
Animal Drugs, was a former Monsanto research scientist
who had worked on Monsanto's rBGH safety studies up until 1989.
R. Taylor, the FDA deputy commissioner for Policy, previously employed by
Monsanto for seven years, wrote the FDA rBGH labelling guidelines.
To keep rBGH-milk from being
"stigmatized" in the marketplace, the FDA announced that labels on non-rBGH
products must state that there is no difference between rBGH and the naturally
This web site is not a commercial web site and
is presented for educational purposes only.
This website defines a
new philosophical ideology to which its author adheres. The author feels that
the falsification of reality outside personal experience has forged a populace
unable to discern propaganda from reality and that this has been done
purposefully by an international corporate cartel through their agents who wish
to foist a corrupt version of reality on the human race. Religious intolerance
occurs when any group refuses to tolerate religious practices, religious
beliefs or persons due to their religious ideology. This web site marks the
founding of a mystery school aptly named The Truth of the Way of the
Lumière Infinie - a rational gnostic mystery religion based on reason
which requires no leap of faith, accepts no tithes, has no supreme leader, no
church buildings and in which each and every individual is encouraged to
develop a personal relation with the Creator and Sustainer through the pursuit
of the knowledge of reality in the hope of curing the spiritual corruption that
has enveloped the human spirit. The tenets of The Truth of the Way of the
Lumière Infinie are spelled out in detail on this web site by the
author. Violent acts against individuals due to their religious beliefs in
America is considered a "hate crime."
This web site in no way condones
violence. To the contrary the intent here is to reduce the violence that is
already occurring due to the international corporate cartels desire to control
the human race. The international corporate cartel already controls the world
banking system, corporate media worldwide, the global industrial military
entertainment complex and is responsible for the collapse of morals, the
elevation of self-centered behavior and the destruction of global ecosystems.
Civilization is based on coöperation. Coöperation does not occur at
the point of a gun.
American social mores and values have declined
precipitously over the last century as the corrupt international cartel has
garnered more and more power. This power rests in the ability to deceive the
populace in general through corporate media by pressing emotional buttons which
have been preprogrammed into the population through prior corporate media
psychological operations. The results have been the destruction of the family
and the destruction of social structures that do not adhere to the corrupt
international elites vision of a perfect world. Through distraction and
coercion the direction of thought of the bulk of the population has been
directed toward solutions proposed by the corrupt international elite that
further consolidates their power and which further their purposes.
views and opinions presented on this web site are the views and opinions of
individual human men and women that, through their writings, showed the
capacity for intelligent, reasonable, rational, insightful and unpopular
thought. All factual information presented on this web site is believed to be
true and accurate and is presented as originally presented in print media which
may or may not have originally presented the facts truthfully. Opinion and
thoughts have been adapted, edited, corrected, redacted, combined, added to,
re-edited and re-corrected as nearly all opinion and thought has been
throughout time but has been done so in the spirit of the original writer with
the intent of making his or her thoughts and opinions clearer and relevant to
the reader in the present time.
Fair Use Notice
This site may contain
copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our
efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, human rights, political,
economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe
this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for
in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for
research and educational purposes. For more information see:
www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted
material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
© Lawrence Turner
All Rights Reserved