"The spirit of the depths took my understanding
and all my knowledge and placed them at the service of the inexplicable and the
paradoxical." - Carl Jung
Paradox is defined
a self-contradictory and false proposition.
opinion or statement contrary to commonly accepted opinion.
contradictory statement that may nonetheless be true.
any person, thing, or
situation exhibiting an apparently contradictory nature.
"In all affairs it's a healthy thing now and then
to hang a question mark
on the things you have long taken for
Bertrand Arthur William
Persistent contradictory opposites create
and lack of possession of sufficient contrary
skepticism regarding complex analytical intricacies allows intimidation and
ingratiation of an individual by the politician through
conscious intervention designed to
con-vince the individual of the
truth or falsity of the reality presented as fact.
congruent social systems allow for a measure of problematic proportion to be
assigned to each individual of a subcultural ideology.
"They that approve a private opinion,
an opinion; but they that mislike it, heresy:
and yet heresy signifies no
more than private opinion."
- Thomas Hobbs
"When I told them to shun hypocrisy, they
all agreed with me.
But they did not know that when I said "truth",
knew that they did not know what truth was,
and that therefore both they
and I were then being hypocrites.
They did not know that when I told them
not to be hypocrites
they were being hypocrites in not asking me the
They did not know that I was being a hypocrite in merely saying
:'Do not be hypocrites',
because words do not convey the message by
They respected me, therefore, when I was acting hypocritically.
They had been taught to do this.
They respected themselves while they
were thinking hypocritically;
for it is hypocrisy to think that one is
being improved simply by thinking that it is bad to be a hypocrite,
Path leads beyond: to the Practice and the understanding where there can be
no hypocrisy, where honesty is there and not something which is man's aim." -
Saadi of Shiraz
Liar Paradox shows
us that popular belief about truth and falsity actually lead to a
Sentences can be constructed that cannot consistently
be assigned a truth value even though they are completely in accord with
grammar and semantic rules.
Consider the simplest version of the paradox, the sentence;
This statement is false.
If we suppose that the
statement is true, everything asserted in it must be true. However, because the
statement asserts that it is itself false, it
must be false. So the hypothesis that
it is true leads to the contradiction that it is both true and false.
Yet we cannot conclude that the sentence is false for that hypothesis also leads to
contradiction. If the statement is
false, then what it says about itself is not true. It says that it is false, so
that must not be true. Hence, it is true.
hypothesis, we end up concluding that
the statement is both true and false. But it has to be either true or false (or
so our intuition lead us to
think), hence there seems to be a contradiction at the core of our
beliefs about truth and falsity.
Since the Liar Sentence can be shown to be
true if it is false and false if it is true it is neither true or
To solve the riddle of the Liar Paradox one must reject a
common myth about truth and falsity - the
claim that every statement has to be either true or false.
This is called the Principle of
A strengthened version of the Liar Paradox counters the proposal
that the statement is neither true or false.
This statement is not
If it is not true or false, then it is not true, which is
what it says; hence it is true which is not what it says.
The truth is
every statement includes an implicit assertion of its own
For example, the statement
"It is true that two plus two equals
four" contains no more information than the statement "two plus two
is four", because the phrase "it is true that..." is always implicitly there.
Thus the statement;
This statement is
is said to be equivalent to;
This statement is true and this statement is false.
latter is a simple contradiction
of the form "A and not A", and hence is false.
There is no
paradox because the claim that this statement is false does not lead to a
analysis does not provide a solution
to versions of the Liar Paradox that do not use direct self-reference,
such as the two-sentence version:
The next sentence is false.
The preceding sentence is true.
Neither of these is by itself
contradictory, but there is no way to assign
truth values to them consistently, so we still
have a paradox.
A series of sentences becomes paradoxical or congruent
upon contingent facts.
back to stacks
This web site is not a commercial web site and
is presented for educational
This website defines a
new perspective with which to engage reality to which its author adheres. The
author feels that the falsification of reality outside personal experience has
created a populace unable to discern propaganda from reality and that this has
been done purposefully by an international corporate cartel through their
agents who wish to foist a corrupt version of reality on the human race.
Religious intolerance occurs when any group refuses to tolerate religious
practices, religious beliefs or persons due to their religious ideology. This
web site marks the founding of a system of philosophy named The Truth of the
Way of Life - a rational gnostic mystery religion based on reason which
requires no leap of faith, accepts no tithes, has no supreme leader, no church
buildings and in which each and every individual is encouraged to develop a
personal relation with the Creator and Sustainer through the pursuit of the
knowledge of reality in the hope of curing the spiritual corruption that has
enveloped the human spirit. The tenets of The Truth of the Way of Life are
spelled out in detail on this web site by the author. Violent acts against
individuals due to their religious beliefs in America is considered a "hate
This web site in no way condones violence. To the contrary the
intent here is to reduce the violence that is already occurring due to the
international corporate cartels desire to control the human race. The
international corporate cartel already controls the world economic system,
corporate media worldwide, the global industrial military entertainment complex
and is responsible for the collapse of morals, the elevation of self-centered
behavior and the destruction of global ecosystems. Civilization is based on
cooperation. Cooperation does not occur at the point of a gun.
social mores and values have declined precipitously over the last century as
the corrupt international cartel has garnered more and more power. This power
rests in the ability to deceive the populace in general through corporate media
by pressing emotional buttons which have been preprogrammed into the population
through prior corporate media psychological operations. The results have been
the destruction of the family and the destruction of social structures that do
not adhere to the corrupt international elites vision of
a perfect world. Through distraction and
coercion the direction of thought of the bulk of the population has been
directed toward solutions proposed by the corrupt international elite that
further consolidates their power and which further their purposes.
views and opinions presented on this web site are the views and opinions of
individual human men and women
that, through their writings, showed the capacity for intelligent, reasonable,
rational, insightful and unpopular thought. All factual information presented
on this web site is believed to be true and accurate and is presented as
originally presented in print media which may or may not have originally
presented the facts truthfully. Opinion and thoughts have been adapted, edited,
corrected, redacted, combined, added to, re-edited and re-corrected as nearly
all opinion and thought has been throughout time but has been done so in the
spirit of the original writer with the intent of making his or her thoughts and
opinions clearer and relevant to the reader in the present time.
Fair Use Notice
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has
not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making
such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal
justice, human rights, political, economic, democratic,
scientific, and social justice
issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted
material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed
without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes. For more
information see: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond
'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
© Lawrence Turner
All Rights Reserved