"Our observations upon the conduct of others
insensibly lead us to form within ourselves certain general rules concerning
what is proper either to be done or avoided.
Those general rules of
conduct are properly called a sense of duty,
a principle of the greatest
consequence in human life, and the only principle by which the bulk of
mankind are capable of directing their actions.
Without this sacred
regard to general rules, there is no man whose conduct can be much depended
This is what constitutes the essential difference between a
man of principle and honor,
and a worthless fellow.
The one adheres
steadily and resolutely to his maxims, and
preserves through his life
one even tenor of conduct.
The other acts variously and accidently,
as humor, inclination, or interest chance to be uppermost.
tolerable observance of these duties [ justice, truth, chastity, fidelity]
depends the very existence of human society, which would crumble into nothing
if mankind were not generally impressed with reverence for those important
rules of conduct." - Adam Smith
|The American moral compass
twisted and spun like a metalized mylar Mickey mouse balloon caught in the
slipstream of a violently rotating column of highly combustible air.
When the plasma lightening bolt struck that metalized mylar Mickey
mouse balloon, a resounding thunderclap, that left the ears ringing like the
firing of a Colt .45, could be heard for miles away across the lifeless barren
Years later it was noted by eminent moral philosophers that the
American moral compass had been improperly maintained by those moral compass
gatekeepers largely due to the acceptance of molecular biology within the body
It was finally agreed that a turning away from the dependence
on life to give life to the transhuman subsistence on toxic minerals and
genetically modified organisms which destroyed
ability to engage in critical thought was the culprit.
at first sight a very rational way of testing any proposed rule of conduct is
to ask - how will it work?
Taking men as we know them, and
institutions as they are, what
will result from carrying such a theory into practice?
very common-sense style of
inquiry is that by which most opinions on morals and politics are formed.
People consider the
feasiblity of social systems, whether it will square with this or the other
social arrangement, whether it fits with
They have notions of what man
is, and what
society must be; any ethical doctrine depends upon its accordance or
discordance with these.
Moral systems are adopted or condemned regularly
due to the consistency of the inconsistency of men to take for granted nothing
And yet we know human
nature to be infinitely variable.
One correct course is open; he
must either follow or take the consequences.
conditions of existence do not
bend before his perversity.
When they are broken,
no exception from
penalties are to be hoped for.
Confounded by ever-new aspects of human
affairs, it is not surprising men fail to recognize the systematic
character of the natural
Accumulated evidence is gradually generating the
conviction that events play out in a certain inevitable way by unchanging
forces in human nature.
In all ages there has been some glimmering
perception of this truth; and experience
is ever giving to that perception increased distinctness.
even now all men do, in one mode or other, testify of such a
Every known creed is an assertion
What are the moral codes of the
acknowledgments of inseparable connection
between conduct and results?
Do they not all say you shall not do
this, and this, because they will produce evil; and you shall do that
and that, because they will produce good?
We imply such a
faith, too, in our every day conversations; in our maxims and precepts, in our
education of children,
in our advice to friends.
In judging we instinctively refer
to some standard of ascertained
We predict good or
evil of this or the other scheme, because of its accordance or
discordance with certain perceived social laws of
Surely, then, if all believe in the persistency of these
secondary laws, much more should they believe in the persistency of those
primary ones, which
underlie human existence, and out of which our every day truths grow.
Either society has laws, or it has not.
If it has not, there
can be no order, no certainty, no system in its phenomena.
If it has,
they are sure, inflexible,
ever active, and having no exceptions.
ascertained what these
laws are; we implicitly obey them!
Only by submission to them can
anything permanently succeed.
Only as it complies with the principles of
moral equilibrium can it stand.
Our social edifice may be constructed
with ingenuity, and clamped together with cunningly-devised enactments, but
there must be rectitude for
its component parts - if it is not built on upright principles, it
As well might we seek to light a fire with ice, feed
cattle on stones, hang our
hats on cobwebs, or otherwise disregard the
physical laws of the world, as
go contrary to its equally imperative
We cannot always be strictly guided by
Prudential considerations must have some weight.
It is necessary to use a little
specious are your reasons for advocating this or the other exception.
Rest satisfied that they are no more impossible than are your proposed
exceptions, which similarly conflict with the essential social laws of
One breach of moral law
leaves a gap for
numberless subsequent trespasses.
If the first move has been taken
with impunity, it will be followed by others.
Make a hole through a
principle to admit a solitary exception and so many other exceptions will be
thrust through after as to render the principle void.
closely traced, this same plea
for licence in special cases turns out to be
the source of nearly all the evils
that afflict us.
breaker confesses his act is at variance with moral law, which he admits to
be, and in some sort believes to be, the best guide.
The rule breaker
thinks that his interest requires him to make exceptions.
All rule breakers do this;
and see the result.
A rule breaker is laying claim to the perfect
knowledge of precognition.
In short, he is assuming
omniscience, a requisite for success.
Departure from principle to escape
anticipated evil is a return to the proved errors
of engaging in political expediency.
Further enforced by reflection,
to think we can better ourselves
by deserting the road marked out, is
an impious assumption
of divine omniscience.
If the foolishness of such
conduct needs illustrating by facts, there are plenty.
Constant failure of unethical
schemes exemplifies these ethical principles.
The enslavement of the
negroes serves as a good example.
Rich soils, a splendid climate
and a large market for the sale
Now, could but a sufficiency of labourers be imported
and reduced to servitude, what
profit they would bring to their possessors!
golden visions have been far from
are comparatively poverty stricken all over the Earth.
states of America are far behind their northern neighbors in
are in process of abandoning
slavery one after another.
Somehow the scheme has not answered as
Though worked in some cases sixteen hours out of the
twenty-four; supported on "a pint of flour and one salt herring per day;"
kept to his work by whips,
the slave did not bring to his owner
the large profit calculated.
It has turned out that under like
circumstances wage labor is
Then there came results that were never looked for.
Slavery brought in its train the
multiplied curses of a diseased social state; a reign of mutual
demoralization; of sin-begotten
recklessness; of extravagant
expenditure; of bad
cultivation, exhausted soils,
thought it would be highly beneficial to the mother country if the colonies
were constrained to become her customers by prohibiting settlers from
purchasing certain goods from any other country than England and actually
denying them the right to make those goods for themselves!
As usual the manuvre proved
worse than abortive.
That outlay was wholly thrown away, and worse
than thrown away; for it turns out that
artificial trades so obtained
entail loss upon both parties.
the résistance of
the settlers, war of
independence, and the hundred and odd
millions added to our national burdens!
What an astounding
illustration of the defeat of dishonesty by the eternal laws of right conduct
we have in the history of the
Selfish, unscrupulous, worldly-wise policy, unlimited
force to back it, this oligarchy perseveringly carried out schemes of
It subjugated province
It laid one prince after
another under tribute.
upon adjacent rulers, and construed refusal into a pretext for
It became sole
proprietor of the land, claiming one-half the produce as rent.
uniting in itself the character of conqueror,
With all these
resources, what could it
be but prosperous?
From the spoils of victorious war,
the rent of millions of acres, the
tribute of dependent monarchs,
the profits of an
exclusive trade, what untold wealth must have poured in upon it! what
revenues! what a bursting exchequer!
Alas! the Company is some
50,000,000l. in debt.
These are but a few samples from a
If diligently traced,
the results of abandoning
the ethical to pursue the expedient will uniformly be found to end
Men insane enough to
think that they may safely violate fundamental laws of right conduct,
may read in such defeats and
disasters their own fate.
Let them but inquire, and they will find
that each petty evil, each great catastrophe, is in some way
the consequence of a
sequence of injustice.
Yet this commentary on -
history as we call it - men for
ever read in vain!
Distraction and fear
keeps them from collecting
What are laws determine national
success or failure, stability or
they gossip about
state intrigue, court
scandals, crimes of
nobles, the quarrels of
kings, and other like
details, the vanity and
frippery of bygone times,
decorations of the web
of existence, they examine,
Yet they are blind to
stern realities each
age shrouds in its superficial
tissue of events - terrible truths which glare
out from the gloom of the past.
successive strata of our historical
deposits, they diligently gather
highly-coloured fragments, pounce upon
everything that is
curious and sparkling,
and chuckle like children over
their glittering acquisitions; meanwhile the
rich veins of wisdom lie
Why all this laboured examination into the
propriety, or impropriety, of making exceptions to an ascertained ethical law?
The very question is absurd.
What does it mean to say a thing is "theoretically just," or "abstractedly correct " or a
man should be "true to principle."
Simply it accords with what is
perceived as the natural moral order.
What is theoretically just, in
strict duty, should be done.
True to principle requires
harmonious conformity with
The appointed path to
human happiness remains
infidelity, the true
atheism is to doubt the reality of the
natural moral order with the presumption individual judgement is less
If there be any weight in the considerations above set forth,
then, no matter how seemingly inexpedient, dangerous, injurious
even, may be the course which morality points out as "abstractedly right,"
the highest wisdom is in fearless
submission to the natural moral order." - Herbert
People judge others by personal
rules of conduct which may not be standard within
a social culture and may
not conform to the natural
The moral sense is as
vulnerable to illusions as the other senses.
A corrupt moral sense
confuses morality with 'perfection' and
corrupt moral sense tends to reframe practical problems as
and thus see their solution in
A corrupt moral sense
imposes taboos that make
A corrupt moral
sense is the result of
falling into spiritual
Most people think it's bad to harm others and
good to help them.
People have a sense of fairness: that
one should reciprocate
benefactors and punish cheaters.
value loyalty to a group,
sharing and solidarity among
its members and conformity to its norms.
They believe that it is right to defer to legitimate
sanctity while reject
For a moral maxim to be true it must have a
First formulation of the categorical imperative:
"Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will
that it should become a universal law." - Immanuel Kant
formulation of the categorical imperative:
"Act in such a way that you
treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other,
always at the same time as an end and never merely as a means to an end." -
Third formulation of the categorical imperative:
"Every rational being must so act as if he were through his maxim
always a legislating member in the universal kingdom of ends." -
universal action that will inevitably destroy a civilization:
Deception - If it is
universally acceptable to lie, then no one would believe anyone and all truths
would be assumed to be lies.
Theft - If it is universally
acceptable to steal there could be no ownership.
Suicide - If it is
universally acceptable to commit
suicide when faced with the realization that many
life goals are
This web site is not a commercial web site and
is presented for educational purposes only.
This website defines a
new perspective with which to engage reality to which its author adheres. The
author feels that the falsification of reality outside personal experience has
forged a populace unable to discern propaganda from reality and that this has
been done purposefully by an international corporate cartel through their
agents who wish to foist a corrupt version of reality on the human race.
Religious intolerance occurs when any group refuses to tolerate religious
practices, religious beliefs or persons due to their religious ideology. This
web site marks the founding of a system of philosophy named The Truth of the
Way of the Lumière Infinie - a rational gnostic mystery religion based
on reason which requires no leap of faith, accepts no tithes, has no supreme
leader, no church buildings and in which each and every individual is
encouraged to develop a personal relation with the Creator and Sustainer
through the pursuit of the knowledge of reality in the hope of curing the
spiritual corruption that has enveloped the human spirit. The tenets of The
Truth of the Way of the Lumière Infinie are spelled out in detail on
this web site by the author. Violent acts against individuals due to their
religious beliefs in America is considered a "hate crime."
This web site
in no way condones violence. To the contrary the intent here is to reduce the
violence that is already occurring due to the international corporate cartels
desire to control the human race. The
international corporate cartel already controls the world economic system,
corporate media worldwide, the global industrial military entertainment complex
and is responsible for the collapse of morals, the elevation of self-centered
behavior and the destruction of global ecosystems. Civilization is based on
coöperation. Coöperation does not occur at the point of a
American social mores and values have declined precipitously over
the last century as the corrupt international cartel has garnered more and more
power. This power rests in the ability to deceive the populace in general
through corporate media by pressing emotional buttons which have been
preprogrammed into the population through prior corporate media psychological
operations. The results have been the destruction of the family and the
destruction of social structures that do not adhere to the corrupt
international elites vision of a perfect world. Through distraction and
coercion the direction of thought of the bulk of the population has been
directed toward solutions proposed by the corrupt international elite that
further consolidates their power and which further their purposes.
views and opinions presented on this web site are the views and opinions of
individual human men and women that, through their writings, showed the
capacity for intelligent, reasonable, rational, insightful and unpopular
thought. All factual information presented on this web site is believed to be
true and accurate and is presented as originally presented in print media which
may or may not have originally presented the facts truthfully.
Opinion and thoughts have
been adapted, edited, corrected, redacted, combined, added to, re-edited and
re-corrected as nearly all opinion and thought has been throughout time but has
been done so in the spirit of the original writer with the intent of making his
or her thoughts and opinions clearer and relevant to the reader in the present
Fair Use Notice
This site may contain
copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our
efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, human rights, political,
economic, democratic, scientific, and
social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit
to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. For more information see:
www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted
material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
© Lawrence Turner
All Rights Reserved